Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Going for gold via the Eastern Bloc

By Greg Barns - posted Wednesday, 15 March 2006

When it comes to sport, Australia is the last remnant of the old Eastern Bloc. Just as the Soviet Union and its satellites, in particular East Germany, poured millions of dollars into state-run elite sports facilities, so today the Australian Government keeps the Australian Institute of Sport alive, courtesy of the taxpayer.

Where other nations, such as the US and Europe, rely on funding private or state-run general educational institutions to turn out their elite athletes, no politician in Australia would dare suggest abolishing the AIS.

Perhaps it’s not surprising that the AIS is steeped in the good old Eastern Bloc tradition. After all, the AIS was a creature that grew from the collective wailing and gnashing of teeth after Australia’s dismal performance at the 1976 Montreal Olympics when it failed to win a single gold medal.


With the Eastern Europeans dominating the track and the pool in the 1970s - two areas of endeavour where Australia had traditionally done well - it was decided to follow a winning formula. The AIS began its life in Canberra in 1981 with eight programs.

Today it has grown into a behemoth, offering scholarships to 700 athletes each year in 35 separate programs covering 26 sports. The AIS, according to its website, today employs “about 75 coaches to help these athletes achieve their goals”.

And the cost of all this central planning to the Australian taxpayer? About $110 million in 2005-06.

In fact, funding for the AIS is a bit like funding for defence - it rarely gets a savaging from the Canberra Treasury and finance departments.

When the Howard Government, on its election in 1996, took every sharp implement it could find to cut into the Federal budget to reduce a $10 billion deficit, the AIS, like defence, was spared the worst of it.

Sports Minister Warwick Smith merely had to remind his colleagues that the Atlanta Olympics were on that year and that was that. While pensioners, heath workers, business and farmers all felt the brunt of what was regarded as a seriously tough budget that year, the Australian Institute of Sport got off very lightly indeed.


It had to find general efficiencies to make some savings but Mr Smith was able to announce on Budget night that the 1996-97 budget included “$35.5m for continuation of the 'Maintain the Momentum' program which expands the Australian Sports Commission's funding in the areas of athlete support, coaching, domestic and international competition, talent identification and development, sports science and medicine, participation and administrative support”.

The statist approach to the AIS is in stark contrast to the revolution that arts funding in Australia has undergone since 1996. Under the Howard Government, there has been a move to grow the private philanthropic movement in Australia and to wean operas companies, orchestras, theatres companies and visual artists off the public purse. The tax system has been adjusted to encourage the establishment of private foundations to fund the arts.

Besides the obvious philosophical reason that conservative governments like to privatise charity these days, and that they have a tendency to regard the arts as “elitist”, one of the other key drivers behind the encouragement of greater private funding of the arts is that long term, the pressures on the Federal budget from a declining and ageing population will squeeze out spending on areas such as the arts.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

14 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Greg Barns is National President of the Australian Lawyers Alliance.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Greg Barns

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Greg Barns
Article Tools
Comment 14 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy