Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Two steps forward, one step back: price flexibility with rigid quotas

By Andrew Norton - posted Wednesday, 25 June 2003


Commonwealth Education Minister Brendan Nelson's higher education reform package is a radical evolution in policy, preserving and even tightening many elements of the old centrally controlled system, but also creating new price signals and giving students enrolled at private higher education institutions access to a loans scheme.

Under Dr Nelson's package, student charges in government-subsidised places would be set by the university, within limits imposed by the Commonwealth, and these would go to the university.

This is a very important change to the current system of all HECS payments going to the Commonwealth, because it means universities will respond to price signals.

Advertisement

Universities will have a financial incentive to focus on student concerns, evening up a funding system currently rigged in favour of research.

The scope for fee increases on subsidised students will bring the total investment in higher education closer to optimal levels, though still artificially constrained by a price cap.

Loans will be made available for full-fee paying students in public universities, meaning more students will be able to enrol in their first-preference course.

Loans will be made available for students in private universities and colleges, which should eventually create competition with the public system.

The evidence suggests that the higher fees are affordable and will not affect access by low-income groups.

The quota system of allocating subsidised student places will be tightened by adding discipline targets and by penalising universities enrolling more than 2 per cent above their quota of non-full fee paying students.

Advertisement

Rigid quotas are undesirable because they reduce competition and responsiveness to student demand. The 2 per cent limit is impractical, because universities cannot target numbers that accurately.

The current funding system

For universities: There are 38 universities entitled to receive Commonwealth subsidies for undergraduate students, plus four other higher-education providers that receive financial assistance. Entitlement is a political decision, and not based on objective criteria. Institutions within the subsidy system receive funding from the Commonwealth for set numbers of Australian HECS-liable (Higher Education Contribution Scheme) undergraduate students. Though historically this funding was based on nominal costs per student in each discipline, it is now effectively an average subsidy with no relationship to actual costs.

Universities cannot receive any money from HECS-liable students for tuition, but they can charge for non-academic services, commonly known as the union or amenities fee. If universities enroll less than their quota number of HECS-liable students they can be penalised; if they enroll more they receive about $2,700 each. This is less than 25 per cent of average funding.

The total number of places funded is less than total demand from eligible applicants, creating "unmet demand". Since 1998, universities have been able to offer full-fee paying places to Australian undergraduates when they have filled all their HECS-liable places. Such students may not exceed 25 per cent of domestic enrolments in any course. However, there are no limits on the number of overseas students.

For students: Since 1989 Australian undergraduates have had to pay part of their education costs under HECS, and most have always paid a union or amenities fee.

Current HECS charges range from $3,680 to $6,136 a year, depending on degree, and amenities fees range from $100 to $559, depending on university and enrolment status. HECS charges are set by the government and go to the government. Students can pay up-front and get a 25 per cent discount; about one in five take this option. All the others defer payment, and their debt is indexed to inflation.

They must begin repaying when their earnings reach $24,635 per annum, paying at that point 3 per cent of their total income. Repayment rates reach 6 per cent of income for those earning $43,859 or more. Undergraduates taking full-fee positions receive no loans from the Commonwealth. However, postgraduates taking full-fee positions can get a loan under the Postgraduate Education Loans Scheme, known as PELS. PELS debts are merged into HECS debts, and indexed to inflation.

Dr Nelson's proposed funding system

For universities: The number of public universities would remain a matter for government, but other accredited higher-education institutions could access a student loan scheme. All institutions must comply with quality tests.

The number of students in non-full-fee places (HECS-HELP students) is more strictly controlled than before. The government will "negotiate" a discipline mix with each public university, and set a target total number of students. For HECSHELP students, the government will pay universities a subsidy per student based on discipline.

Regional campuses will receive additional subsidies, as will universities which meet governance, productivity, and teaching quality criteria. The university can then charge a fee in excess of whatever subsidies they receive, ranging from $0 to 30 per cent above existing HECS levels. The university will receive this money, either directly from the student or via the government, which will pay on behalf of the student, with the money to be recovered through the tax system. However, universities will no longer be able to charge compulsory fees for costs "not directly related to course provision".

If universities exceed their quota number of students by more than 2 per cent they will be penalised instead of receiving $2,700 a student. However, once universities meet their target number of HECS-HELP students, they can enrol full-fee paying (FEES-HELP) Australian undergraduates. The numerical limit on these students will be extended from 25 per cent of all domestic enrolments to 50 per cent. Fees for these students will be set by the market, but a $50,000 loan ceiling may serve as a de facto price cap. As before, there will be no upper limit on numbers or fees for overseas universities.

For students: Students will pay a fee set by the university. In the case of students within the university's HECS-HELP quota, they will benefit financially from a subsidy of between $1,509 and $16,934, based on discipline. However, most students can benefit from subsidies for only five academic years in a new "learning entitlement" restriction.

HECS-HELP places also have a price cap of 30 per cent higher then existing HECS levels. In courses with high subsidies, prices may go down at some universities. Given cost pressures on universities, average fees will almost certainly be higher.

The new restriction on non-course related charges could reduce costs, but also services. Students who pay tuition fees up front will get a discount of 20 per cent. Students who defer and take out a loan from the Commonwealth will effectively pay a surcharge of 25 per cent, plus their debt will be indexed to inflation, as happens now.

The strict quotas mean that the number of HECS-HELP places may be lower than the number of HECS places currently available. However, the number of full-fee places available under FEES-HELP will increase to a maximum of 50 per cent of domestic students in the course.

The PELS scheme will be abolished, and all Australian full-fee students will be able to borrow up to $50,000 through FEES-HELP. At least for courses with total fees below $50,000, this should mean that more students are able to enrol in their first preference course. Students or graduates with FEESHELP debts will have their debts indexed to inflation, and will be charged 3.5 per cent interest for ten years.

The income threshold at which both HECS-HELP and FEES-HELP debtors must start repaying 3 per cent of their income will be lifted to $30,000. However, new levies of 6.5 per cent to 8 per cent of income will be imposed on students or graduates earning over $52,658.

Conclusion

Though Our Universities: Backing Australia's Future lessens the Commonwealth's control over prices, on a socialism-market spectrum it is still closer to the socialist end. The Commonwealth is not content to be a facilitator, helping with subsidies, loans and information but letting universities and students make the key decisions about what to study, where to study, and how much to spend. Through its rigid quotas, its price and loan caps, and a raft of micromanagement programmes it still wants to control all or influence all these things.

Dr Nelson has said in jest that the Secretary of his Department is a Commissar running a Politburo. This is one joke about the university system he'll be able to use for a long time yet.

Yet for all the flaws of what we are now offered in the Nelson package, it is better than the available alternatives, the status quo or the ALP. The status quo offers too little money and incentives heavily biased against teaching, while the Nelson package goes some way toward correcting both. The ALP plans to outline a policy in the coming weeks. The signs, however, are not encouraging.

Labor offered higher education small sums in the 1998 and 2001 elections. They continually attack university fees. Without that private money, and with serious constraints on public money, it is hard to see how they could match what the Coalition has on offer. Even if they come up with more public money than the government, without using market mechanisms they are not going to be able to target it effectively, or to change universities' incentive structures. At this stage, the status quo and the ALP are just variations on each other, and no solution at all. With a few modifications the Nelson package will begin the long overdue structural reform of Australian higher education.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All

This is an edited extract from an Issues Brief published by the Centre for Independent Studies. Click here to download the full text (pdf, 132kb)



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Andrew Norton is a research fellow at the Centre for Independent Studies and Director of the CIS' Liberalising Learning research programme.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Andrew Norton
Related Links
Backing Australia's Future
Centre for Independent Studies
Department of Education, Science and Training
Photo of Andrew Norton
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy