Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

IVF - in pursuit of the unattainable?

By Daniel Donahoo - posted Tuesday, 31 January 2006


How can we consider giving anonymous sperm donors access to records that will allow them to contact children they have fathered in only the most rudimentary, biological sense - even after they were under the impression that anonymity was a key clause of the initial, porn-fuelled deposit?

Yet we’re unwilling to allow a woman access to the sperm of the man she loved and shared a life with. Such decisions are made in isolation and with a lack of regard for the deeper social consciousness that tries to make sense of these outcomes.

We despise hypocrisy, but in the rapid pursuit of choice and perfection we’re unable to avoid a myriad of ethical inconsistencies.

Advertisement

Of course just before Christmas the Civil and Administrative Tribunal overturned this decision, and perhaps during 2006 we will have the first child fathered in Australia by a dead man. A Ripley’s Believe It or Not if ever there was one.

Still, our continued lack of adherence to rigorous and thoughtful processes exposes our human tendency to hypocrisy. We’re so very fallible. Thanks to scientific discoveries and the strangely held idea that any new science is actually “progress”, we find ourselves in an ethically confusing and contradictory world.

We need to return to the root of the dilemma and start asking questions that are progressive in action, not just in name. We need to ask how important choice is. Is it really a right for most of us to have freedom of choice above everything else?

The root of the IVF dilemma is whether IVF itself actually contributes positively to society. Is it just another example of the pursuit of unattainable perfection?

We want to believe it isn’t that complicated. But it is. The issue of fertility decision-making doesn’t have any perfect answers. The real question is not who should have access to IVF, but just how perfect do we think our lives should be?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

Article edited by Allan Sharp.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

8 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Journalist and columist with The Age, Sushi Das says he is ‘one of today’s young rebels’. Author and ethicist Leslie Cannold has referred to him as one of her ‘gorgeous men’.

Daniel Donahoo is fellow with OzProspect, a non-partisan, public policy think tank. He writes regularly for Australia's daily papers and consults on child and family issues. A father to two boys. Daniel's first book is called Idolising Children and explores our society’s obsession with childhood and youth. Updates on Daniel's work can be found at www.danieldonahoo.com.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Daniel Donahoo

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Daniel Donahoo
Article Tools
Comment 8 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy