Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

RU486: Women will be free to choose

By Lyn Allison - posted Friday, 23 December 2005

David van Gend’s article in On Line Opinion raises a number of interesting points that I will address, hopefully, in a more rational and less emotive manner.

Mr van Gend makes the case against all forms of abortion, not just RU486. That is his right. But the legality and the public support for the termination of pregnancies, under specific circumstances and in consultation with a doctor, is not in question here.

Abortion does not require the special approval of the Federal Health Minister and nor should it. No parliamentarian has the right to interfere in one of the most important, emotional and difficult decisions a woman and her partner may ever have to make.


In the same way, no parliamentarian should decide whether a drug should be available in Australia. The Therapeutic Goods Administration was set up for that purpose. It has the expertise, the resources and the independence to properly evaluate the scientific evidence.

Mr van Gend suggests that the Democrats amendment would undo a unique level of public accountability, but the Federal Parliament currently has no role other than to receive the Health Minister’s advice that approval was granted. There is no capacity to overturn the decision, no requirement to provide reasons and no obligation for the minister to reveal that he or she has refused an application for RU486 or why. This is hardly accountable or transparent.

Mr van Gend and his lobby group want a return to the bad old days of guilt and shame, when backyard abortions were an everyday reality in Australia. But the real question is whether the risks and benefits associated with a newer, less invasive procedure should be scientifically evaluated and offered to women as an alternative to surgical abortion. I believe Australian women, once informed by this evaluation, will want to make that decision for themselves.

Lambasting women for having what he calls “social abortions”, Mr van Gend bemoans the lack of structural change that would allow women to carry these pregnancies to full term. The majority of Australians however, understand that decisions about the number and timing of children are anything but trivial and there are complex and usually compelling reasons for women to end unwanted pregnancies.

Mr van Gend and all those who wish to beat the anti-abortion, anti RU486 drum should be heard, but their battle to turn back the clock was lost years ago and it is now time for compassionate support for women who are in these difficult situations.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

Article edited by Angus Ibbott.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

36 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Lyn Allison is a patron of the Peace Organisation of Australia and was leader of the Australian Democrats from 2004 to 2008.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Lyn Allison
Related Links
Mifepristone is safe and reliable, so why the ban? - On Line Opinion
Note to the PM: Politics doesn’t belong in medicine - On Line Opinion
Political will or safer pill? - On Line Opinion
RU486 - messy, unpredictable, unsafe - On Line Opinion
RU486: Don’t go there - On Line Opinion

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Lyn Allison
Article Tools
Comment 36 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy