Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The grammar detective

By Margaret Ann Williams - posted Thursday, 5 January 2006


Essay option 3 was: “Write an essay addressing the question ‘If you could change one law, or one piece of legislation, what would it be and why.’”

Note to self: no question mark.

Curiouser and curiouser. What academic would frame an essay question in that way, I asked myself. Sounded more like a quiz show.

Advertisement

Changing tack, I went back to Google and into Google Images. Where did these images come from? The key words “Baker”, and “college” led me to the answer: all the images were identical to those on the website of Dartmouth College in the US.

No wonder they didn’t look dinki-di! (Yes, very occasionally exclamation marks are the right punctuation choice.)

The website colour schemes and layout were also dead ringers for Dartmouth’s.

After emailing Dartmouth College to alert them to this odd coincidence, I went to the scholarship site’s “Rules” section, fetchingly illustrated with a feather headdress. The internal logic of this section was pitiful: “If either of the six (6) winners …” when there are six options, the word is “any”, not “either”.

Consistency was lacking, too. “The odds of winning depend on the total number of entries received at the conclusion of the contest.” Contest? Hang on …

If this were a true scholarship granting program, I decided, I would eat my thesaurus.

Advertisement

Something more sinister may be closer to the truth. The organiZation may be after the $16 processing fee demanded. There were two payment options for this fee: a money order sent c/o a Sydney law firm or, alternatively, credit card details could be submitted to a “secure” website.

Investigating further, I have discovered that “scholarship scams” are big business in the US. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission website says about 10 per cent of Internet traffic may be fraudulent and lists the telltale signs. Among them: exclamation marks, CAPITAL LETTERS, poor spelling and badly phrased sentences.

About ten Australian university websites were linked to this dubious scholarship program. It’s easy to be taken in. Just remember, if the grammar stinks, something may well be rotten.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in the Independent Weekly on December 4, 2005.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

28 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Margaret Ann Williams has a Masters in journalism. She is presently living in the United States.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Margaret Ann Williams

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 28 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy