Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Health care - doing the sums

By Kevin Pittman - posted Friday, 28 October 2005


Managing health demands in the face of a widening gap between demand and supply, in an environment of massively rising costs, will inevitably mean that doctors and hospitals will increasingly have to triage patients to establish priorities of need among those patients.

Aiding that, good pricing signals could get across the message that there is no such thing as “free” health. A simple charging regime based on a principle that the less urgently medical care is needed, the more the patient would be charged if they pursued that care would reduce most emergency wards workload by 30 to 50 per cent. Conversely, investigating ways of economically rewarding people for self-management of their own health would also help to ensure that people who most needed care would get it.

There is no sensible economic reason why a two-income couple should get free non-emergency care in public hospitals rather than going to their GP and paying for the service. It is nonsense to say that they have already paid for the public system with their taxes. People pay taxes that are then spent on all sorts of public goods, most of which are not open to everyone. So we happily insist, for example, that welfare should be closely targeted without thinking about whether the same rules should apply for public health provision.

Advertisement

If we want to spend money on our notional two-income family, we’d all do far better to spend money teaching them about self-management of their own and their family’s health - how to conserve and foster their own health and how to make informed and sensible lifestyle decisions that maximise their healthy enjoyment of a long life.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

6 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Kevin Pittman is the principal of Solomon Reynard Pty Ltd, a boutique consultancy specialising in health and organisational management.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Kevin Pittman

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 6 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy