Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Devious corporations, devious government, poor workers …

By Ken McKay - posted Tuesday, 12 July 2005


What about single site operations employing more than 100 workers? Would the workers be safe from corporate skulduggery? No, the employer would simply establish arrangements such as employing all the clerical staff with one company, production workers with another and maintenance staff with yet another.

John Howard went to the last election promising to lift the unfair dismissal legislation burden from small business, those with less than 20 workers, and he has suddenly lifted the threshold to 100.

It is very obvious why. He wants to deny workers, not just those working for small businesses, but virtually all workers, access to unfair dismissal protection.

Advertisement

Some may think this is very unlikely, but anyone familiar with the Trading Hour legislation in Queensland (and probably other states as well) would be well aware of how corporations restructured to ensure that the number of employees in retail operations were below the minimum thresholds, just so that they would be exempt from regulated trading hours.

It may be useful to reminisce about what happened with unfair dismissals prior to the enactment of specific legislation dealing with the issue.

The only mechanism for reinstatement was an order of the Industrial Commission to resolve an industrial dispute. In many cases it was a “real” dispute with workers walking off the job: in some cases it was a “paper” dispute.

It doesn’t take much imagination to see what will become commonplace if there is no judicial system to allow unfair dismissal cases to determined.

With skills shortages growing across the nation, unemployment falling and the labour market being deregulated I wonder if the business community understands that there will be a dramatic shift in the balance of power in the labour market. The H.R. Nichols policy prescription may be what businesses want in periods of job shortages, but as the economy moves closer and closer to full employment I wonder if many in the business community have bothered to look around the corner.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

Article edited by Tanvi Mehta.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

15 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Ken McKay is a former Queensland Ministerial Policy Adviser now working in the Queensland Union movement. The views expressed in this article are his views and do not represent the views of past or current employers.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Ken McKay

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Ken McKay
Article Tools
Comment 15 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy