Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

It’s a dry argument

By Daniel Donahoo - posted Friday, 8 July 2005


The drought issue has existed for decades.

There was renewed focus in May through the drought summit held by the NSW Farmers' Association. The event generated national attention: it would be nice to think it also brought the rain. But, it didn’t. It did attracted comments from John Anderson, and moved John Howard to visit the southwest of NSW to get his Blunnies dusty.

The NSW Farmers' Association should be congratulated. They timed their Emergency Drought Summit in Parkes beautifully. Australia’s collective consciousness was once again reminded that for many Australians struggling in drought-stricken areas is not a once-off, but a cycle.

Advertisement

Still, the government focus is too top heavy. We should not be talking solely about short-term support for our farmers.

In the mud left behind by recent rain we need to start discussing long-term support to change our agricultural industry. An agricultural industry which needs as much propping up as ours does is not providing us with the best value for money - especially considering current trade deficit figures.

Governments must start to seriously examine research on drought-tolerant crops, and what strategies will work best in Australian climates. We must increase funding to agricultural scientists who have been monitoring these issues for years. We need to better link our agriculture with global market demands.

We need solutions that respect the reality of our ongoing drought-stricken situation - not policy rooted in providing financial support for unsustainable agriculture. In essence, we need to be thinking about drought - even when it rains.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in the Herald Sun on July 4, 2005.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

6 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Journalist and columist with The Age, Sushi Das says he is ‘one of today’s young rebels’. Author and ethicist Leslie Cannold has referred to him as one of her ‘gorgeous men’.

Daniel Donahoo is fellow with OzProspect, a non-partisan, public policy think tank. He writes regularly for Australia's daily papers and consults on child and family issues. A father to two boys. Daniel's first book is called Idolising Children and explores our society’s obsession with childhood and youth. Updates on Daniel's work can be found at www.danieldonahoo.com.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Daniel Donahoo

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Daniel Donahoo
Article Tools
Comment 6 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy