Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Minimum wages and jobs: The overseas story

By Ian Watson - posted Wednesday, 20 April 2005


Young workers may be most vulnerable to job losses at a high level of the minimum wage. There is less evidence available on the employment effects, if any, for other groups such as women and part-time workers.

Turning to our own neighbourhood, one of the most interesting studies in this field has been done by New Zealand researchers who examined very large increases in youth wages in the period following 2001 and found evidence of positive employment responses. They studied changes to the minimum wage system which had led to wage increases for 18 and 19 year-olds in the order of 69 per cent, and increases for 16 and 17 year-olds of about 41 per cent. It is worth noting how these increases compare with the wage increases studied by Card and Krueger: they were only in the range of 19 to 27 per cent. Clearly, if there was to be an adverse impact on employment, then wage increases of this size should have made it evident. Instead, the New Zealand researchers found:

Positive employment responses to the changes for both groups of teenagers, and that 16-17 year-olds increased their hours worked by 10-15 per cent following the minimum wage changes.

Advertisement

In summary, we could say that the research on the issue of wages and jobs remains strongly divided, but the conventional wisdom is no longer conventional. It is now very much an open question whether pay increases for low wage workers really do lead to job losses down the track. There are some sub-groups, such as young people, for whom the evidence raises concerns. But when it comes to the low wage workforce as a whole, there is no convincing body of contemporary evidence that the conventional wisdom applies.

One of the problems for researchers who are wedded to outmoded economic theories is their pursuit of a generally acceptable and universally applicable answer to this question of wages and jobs. Such a goal is elusive, if not utopian. There are so many unique factors in a local, or even national economies, that universally applicable findings are almost impossible to obtain. The gradualist logic of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission seems to be the most sensible approach. Instead of relying on the casuistry of economic theory, these industrial judges have examined the actual consequences of each National Wage case in the context of the Australian economy, and then acted accordingly.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

13 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Ian Watson is a senior researcher at at acirrt, University of Sydney.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Ian Watson
Article Tools
Comment 13 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy