Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Telstra - egalitarianism of the past or a have-and-have-not scenario?

By Mark Christensen - posted Friday, 11 March 2005


As the current dispute over an export coal terminal expansion in Queensland demonstrates, such second-guessing leads to endless time and money being spent on arguing rather than actually building what is needed.

The implications are clear. The existing regime will deliver cascading network quality based on commercial considerations, such as historical circumstance and cost. Most urban areas and green field residential estates will get top shelf technology. Outside of that, it’s depends on argy-bargy between numerous stakeholders.

On the other hand, if Australia wants a truly social outcome for all, then Telstra should be given an exclusive mandate to deliver a network solution consistent with such a vision. Of course, this would have flow-on implications for structure, ownership and returns to the budget - all of which would be hard to swallow for the government. For example, any such mandate would strengthen arguments for both separation and public ownership of Telstra’s fixed network. This would be messy and likely upset shareholders.

Advertisement

John Howard is the key. He, like the dominant policy-makers in Canberra, refuses to see universal access as important as efficiency, struggling to reconcile such a socialist ideal with received economic wisdom and the prosperity generated by the individualism of the market.

A vision for telecommunications infrastructure gave us a tangible reference point for Australian values. The preferred approach to our current challenge is to shy from this, sell the industry off like British Rail and let someone else worry about it later.

Our only saving grace may be the PM probably thinks he will still be around in 10 years’ time.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

Article edited by Angus Ibbott.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.

First published in The Canberra Times on March 9, 2005.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mark is a social and political commentator, with a background in economics. He also has an abiding interest in philosophy and theology, and is trying to write a book on the nature of reality. He blogs here.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mark Christensen
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy