Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

‘Welfare to Work’ - the new poverty trap? A Liberal response

By Greg Barns - posted Monday, 15 July 2002


In short, welfare to work policies do not of themselves, resolve the "poverty trap" issue and thus increase an individual’s personal autonomy. And they do not necessarily meet the unique needs of each individual through case management.

The Work for the Dole programs of which the Howard government is so enamoured are another illustration of this point. Designed to give people a thirst for work, they can have the opposite effect. The work component in them is often boring and does not give people long-term skills to help them in a sophisticated 21st century economy.

The Keating government’s "Working Nation" programs were a much better model of training and work orientation tailored to the individual.

Advertisement

Of course the proponents of these policies will argue that they are built on the entirely reasonable concept of mutual obligation. That is, that there is a contract between the society and the individual that means that the latter must agree to perform certain tasks because there is the consideration of taxpayer’s dollars.

Such an idea is wholly illiberal. For the classical liberal this contract is based on exploitation - i.e. withdrawal of benefits if the recipient fails to perform a task such as an appointment for an interview - and thus is not a genuine social contract as envisaged by John Locke, David Hume and others.

For a liberal a genuine welfare reform package would include substantial job skilling, educational opportunities, childcare, and early psychological intervention to deal with potential mental illness issues. If all these were available then the expectation that an individual should seek employment when in receipt of welfare would be more just.

As former US Presidential Candidate Bob Dole’s Press Secretary, Douglas MacKinnon, put it in the New York Times recently, we "will all be better off if the poorest families in our communities believe that they, too, have a better chance. They deserve nothing less."

But to achieve Mr MacKinnon’s noble aim we need to devise a welfare system that enhances genuine individual autonomy. This should be the basis of a program of welfare reform, not the politically advantageous rhetoric of "mutual obligation".

The "individual autonomy" policy approach to welfare is exemplified in an excellent recently released paper by Karen Christopher of New York’s Syracuse University. Ms Christopher argues that the way to increase the economic capacity of single mothers is not by encouraging marriage for marriage sake as some conservatives would have us believe is the panacea, but through policy packages that include subsidised child-care, paid-leave policies (why not, for example, allow single mother two weeks extra leave a year during school holidays?), and training programs that continually upgrade the skills of single-mothers.

Advertisement

Welfare to work policies on their own are little more than a political stunt to appease those in the community who envy welfare recipients. Without addressing underlying issues such as mental health, education and parenting capacity, we will still be stuck with the same old poverty trap that has always existed. A liberal approach to the issue, one that emphasises the individual’s autonomy, is the only way forward.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

This is an extract from a speech delivered by Greg Barns to an Oz Prospect Seminar, Melbourne 26 June 2002.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Greg Barns is National President of the Australian Lawyers Alliance.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Greg Barns
Related Links
Ozprospect
Young Liberals
Photo of Greg Barns
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy