Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Advancing Australia Fair

By Tim Martyn - posted Friday, 11 February 2005


In his Australia Day address, the Governor General identified a crisis currently threatening democracy in this country. No, it wasn’t truth in Government; the interference of foreign powers in the making of Australian policy didn’t get a look in either. Rather, Australia must find new ways to get young people interested in politics or else.

“If we cannot find ways to spark their interest and involvement, we risk the consequences,” His Excellency Major General Michael Jeffery warned the crowd assembled in Melbourne’s Royal Exhibition Building. Democracy, and the freedoms that stemmed from it, were increasingly being taken for granted. The Australian “legacy”, as exemplified by the munificent surrounds in which the speech was delivered, was under threat.

“Too few of us really understand how we are governed.” How do we spark “their” interest, the Governor General implored?

Advertisement

Predictably enough, the burden was to fall on the Herculean shoulders of our teachers and volunteers. Through the teaching of “civics and citizenship” the nation would be carried forward by safer hands. Ignorance, his remedy implied, was the root cause: knowledge would precede increased and enhanced engagement by our young people.

I can’t profess to be “the voice” of Young Australia, but I must disagree with this thesis. Young people are all too familiar with how we are governed and this is the source of their discouragement. In a political era in which the “aspirational” voter is king, it pays to be acquisitive, not inquisitive. Unburdened by mortgages and kids, the “youth voice” is met with deafening silence or indignation when it deigns to interject with the question, “How can something morally wrong be economically right?”

The golden straightjacket that restrains either major party from implementing policies that pursue “excessive” socially or environmentally just causes renders the politically inquisitive, politically impotent. There’s no room at the inn for those whose democratic preference lies outside of the choices offered by the mainstream parties. And so young people’s disengagement stems from their alienation.

That we are governed by a party, rather than a federal democratic, political system is painfully clear to many young Australians. Any elected “representative” that chooses to stand for the interests of his or her electorate before that of the party will be subject to swift and brutal “disciplinary” action. Among our parliamentarians there is almost a religious fervour for maintaining the party line, at the expense of real democratic choice.

Another vagary of the Australian electoral system is that an election is decided not on how many votes a party wins, but where they win them. Winning the swinging votes of specific groups within strategic electorates is what causes seats - and Governments - to change hands. Hence, at the last Federal election we saw both major parties appeal to the hip pocket nerves of debt-ridden families in the “mortgage belts” of suburban Brisbane, Sydney and Melbourne, as well as the healthcare-focused battle for the “grey vote.” The votes of young people were of little strategic value to either party, so their policy preferences were ignored.

Australian citizenship, as far as my experience of “civics” instruction goes, implies rights with few responsibilities. One, if not the only responsibility an Australian citizen bears, is to vote at election time. But just what or who are people voting for?

Advertisement

To take a closer look at Australian democracy in action, I joined past Labor leader Mark Latham’s failed campaign to become Prime Minister in 2004 as a “youth media” journalist.

Mark Latham may have been a man of ideas and policy substance, but that fact was seen more as a liability than anything else by those managing his campaign. Labor’s policies were kept almost out of sight by the public relations crew running the show. Because ultimately that is what an Australian election has become: a grand show between competing illusionists. Trite slogans are conjured from policy while the media watches on, entranced, caught in a whirlwind of spin. The end result is not so much the conveyance of information, but infotainment. In such an environment, casting an informed vote is next to impossible.

Young Australians, such as myself, have grown up in a society shaped by aggressive marketing campaigns. We know advertising when we see it and many of us have become increasingly suspicious of the hard sell. As consumers, we’ve learnt that the only way to convey that we’re “not buying” is to turn it off or turn away.

That’s what is causing so many young people to disengage from the Australian democratic process: the overemphasis on disingenuous marketing ploys to “sell” the party fairytale, while glossing over the accompanying policies. Instead of engaging with the electorate in an exchange of ideas about the direction the nation should be heading, we get bickering and name-calling from our representatives and so we turn away.

To young people such as myself, the two major parties locked in their seemingly endless arm-wrestle for electoral supremacy, offer little more than a choice between Fruit Loops and Coco Pops - both saccharine, hollow in the middle and of dubious nutritional value. You wouldn’t want to eat them every day if you expected to “grow up big and strong,” and neither will Australia.

Perhaps our responsibility as young Australian citizens is better informing ourselves about the proper functioning of a healthy democracy. But in the absence of healthy choices, disengagement seems almost a rational alternative. If only older Australians would become more engaged with what sort of country they would like their children and grandchildren to live in, instead of the houses they would like to live in, then perhaps the major parties would become less inclined to bribe and berate us.

Governor General Jeffrey is right: freedom is precious and should be valued by all of us. What we have in Australia is the freedom to choose, without threat of violence. All of us, not just young people, have the responsibility to become engaged in building a healthy democracy. The foundations for modern Australia may have been laid at Federation, but we cannot afford to rest upon their legacy.

The Australian people, as well as the operation of our political system, now look very different from those envisaged at Federation. Similarly, the world is a very different place. As such, we citizens need to consider what reforms need to be made to adapt to this changed environment. The economy has undergone a radical overhaul during the last two decades, and it continues to be reformed in the purported interests of the nation; surely the same logic applies to our political system and the institutions of government?

Being an Australian citizen, young or old, demands more than merely barracking for a particular political party: Citizenship demands that we imagine what sort of Australia we want to create today, tomorrow, next week, next month, next year, next century and on into the future. That is the only way to Advance Australia Fair.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

20 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Tim Martyn is a regular writer for vibewire.net, is the theme editor for the Department of Victorian Communities YouthCentral site and as his day job is a Policy and Research Officer for Jesuit Social Services.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Tim Martyn
Article Tools
Comment 20 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy