Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

The Reserve Bank demonstrates 'masterly inactivity'

By Saul Eslake - posted Wednesday, 19 January 2005

The global growth cycle has peaked

The world economy grew by about 5 per cent last year - its strongest performance since 1976 - despite continuing geo-political uncertainty, rising US interest rates and a sharp and sustained rise in oil prices.

Global growth momentum peaked around the third quarter of last year, and seems likely to slow to an average of around 4 per cent this year, on the assumptions that US interest rates continue to rise gradually and that oil prices average around US$40 per barrel. The US and China will together again account for some 40 per cent of total world growth, while Europe and Japan will once more be drags on the global chain, each growing by less than 2 per cent.

The most important development in the world economy in 2005 is likely to be the extent of the fall in the US$. Although the US$ has started the year on a surprisingly firm footing, the underlying trend is still expected to be downwards for much of 2005, especially against the euro and other freely floating currencies, reflecting the reluctance of private sector investors outside the US to supply the more than US$2.5 billion required each working day to finance the US current account deficit.


At some point, Asian central banks - which for much of the past two years, have been filling the void left by private sector investors, purchasing more than US$400 billion per annum in an attempt to prevent their currencies from appreciating - will probably decide to allow their currencies to rise. The decision will be led by China, and will come at a time that best suits China’s strategic and economic interests, not in response to US (or financial market) pressure.

2005 may well be the year in which China decides to allow somewhat greater flexibility in the yuan’s exchange rate, most likely by moving to a (still closely managed) float against a basket of other currencies: but even in that event, a large revaluation of the yuan seems improbable. Until then, a falling US dollar - especially if the decline becomes disorderly - will tend to dampen global growth. That’s because central banks in Japan and Europe can’t, or won’t, cut interest rates in order to offset the negative effects of a rising yen and euro on their growth rates: while governments in Japan and Europe are constrained from using fiscal policy to boost growth by their already large budget deficits and rapidly ageing demographic profiles.

US$ weakness poses a dilemma for the RBA

The prospect of further appreciation of the A$, at least against its US counterpart, creates a dilemma for the Reserve Bank.

With domestic economic growth still strong, not least because of the $60 billion (equivalent to more than 1.5 per cent of GDP), which the Federal Government threw at it in the lead-up to last year’s election, and resources (of both labour and production capacity) becoming scarcer, the Bank still has a “bias” towards raising interest rates. But with the currency likely to spend much of this year above US80 cents, it will be difficult for the Bank credibly to project inflation rising towards, or above, the upper band of their 2-3 per cent inflation target range, which is their usual trigger for raising rates. Indeed, inflation could well be under 2 per cent for a good deal of 2005, thanks to the impact of a stronger currency on the prices of imported and import-competing goods and services.

However the Bank will be reluctant to cut interest rates in the face of sub-target inflation, for fear of re-igniting the property bubble, which it adroitly deflated, with almost no damage to the rest of the economy, during 2003-04. Hence it seems quite possible that, for the second year running, the Reserve Bank will leave the cash rate untouched - which would constitute an unprecedented period of “masterly inactivity” on their part.

Will exports continue to disappoint?

Another year of steady and, by historical standards, low interest rates combined with robust employment growth, rising real wages, another round of income tax cuts beginning July 1, and strong corporate profits, should ensure that any slowdown in domestic spending is quite modest, despite the softening in housing activity, which is now well under way.


The most serious concern with regard to the outlook for economic growth is the persistently poor performance of Australian exports. For the past two years, now, both government and private sector forecasters have looked to a pick-up in exports to offset the expected slowing in domestic spending. To date, neither has happened.

To be sure, global demand for many of Australia’s most important exports - minerals and energy commodities in particular - is stronger than it has been for many years, largely thanks to the emergence of China as a major purchaser of a wide range of these products.

Strong global demand has been reflected in sharp increases in the world prices of many of our more important non-rural export commodities. But the volume of Australian exports of these commodities has fallen in five of the past six, and in nine of the past twelve, quarters - largely the result of inadequate investment in production capacity in recent years, and bottlenecks in State government infrastructure.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

This is an expanded version of an article prepared for the newsletter of HLB Mann Judd, published in January 2005.

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Saul Eslake is a Vice-Chancellor’s Fellow at the University of Tasmania.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Saul Eslake
Photo of Saul Eslake
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy