Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Return of the big bad Russian bear

By Paul Dibb - posted Wednesday, 22 December 2004


As Berman points out, the US's new emphasis on Central Asia and the Caucasus as part of the global war against terrorism is drawing a strong Russian response. In Uzbekistan, Russia has negotiated an agreement that effectively puts Moscow in charge of much of Tashkent's military policy. Last year, the Russian military opened its first foreign base since the fall of the Soviet Union, in Kyrgyzstan.

This year, Tajikistan granted Moscow military basing rights "on a free of charge and open-ended basis". Russia and Kazakhstan have also inaugurated a joint action plan for security co-operation.

In the Caucasus, Russia has negotiated the use of military bases in Armenia. Moscow continues to foment separatist tendencies within Georgia and has threatened to cease gas supplies to Azerbaijan.

Advertisement

In June, Moscow commenced large-scale military exercises - called Mobility 2004 - with a clear signal to its neighbours that it possesses the will and firepower to project force. The Russian Foreign Ministry said they were intended to demonstrate that "any place is within our reach".

So, how did we get to this remove? Not all of it can be levelled at a paranoid Russia. Had the West mounted a serious attempt to aid Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union, we might have had a better chance of a democratic Russia. Instead, Washington was intent on never allowing Russia to emerge again as a major power. The expansion of NATO up to the Russian borders, including basing NATO planes in Lithuania, NATO activity in the Caucasus, and the prospect of the Ukraine joining the EU and NATO, may turn out to be a fatal step in the history of the 21st century.

President Putin has made it clear that Moscow should not allow this erosion of Russia's geopolitical space. The Chief of the Russian General Staff has written: "A powerful military stationed at our borders with no declared objective poses a threat to any non-NATO country. Sensible leaders would realise this and prepare to counter the threat."

The problem is that Russia, after 400 years of autocracy, has never felt its independence threatened in this way before from European hegemony. The forthcoming elections in Ukraine may just provide Moscow with the pretext it requires to assert control over what it sees as vital geopolitical space.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in The Australian on December 10, 2004.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

1 post so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Professor Paul Dibb, former deputy secretary of defence and director of the Defence Intelligence Organisation, is head of the Strategic and Defence Studies Centre at the Australian National University.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Paul Dibb
Article Tools
Comment 1 comment
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy