Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Is Kathleen Folbigg an innocent victim of SIDS?

By Bernie Matthews - posted Friday, 10 December 2004


The Crown successfully argued that Folbigg suffocated her four babies over a ten-year period because she had a low threshold to stress and had resented their intrusion into her life despite any conclusive evidence to support that theory. Crown Prosecutor Tedeschi told the jury that Folbigg smothered her babies "in a flash of anger, hatred and resentment".

Folbigg’s defence team retaliated to those accusations by claiming that 19-day-old Caleb, 8-month-old Patrick, 10-month-old Sarah and 19-month-old Laura all died from SIDS. They argued Caleb died from a floppy larynx, Patrick an epileptic fit, Sarah an inflamed uvula and Laura died of the heart disease myocarditis. A panel of international experts disagreed and unanimously testified they had never heard of four children in the same family dying of SIDS. It was claimed the odds occurring within the same family was a staggering one in one trillion.

Despite the statistical evidence that helped convict Kathleen Folbigg the disturbing similarity that emerged between the Clark, Patel and Cannings cases is also present in the Folbigg case. That evidence coincides with the prospective re-opening of 258 similar cases of infanticide in Britain.

Advertisement

The three eminent judges of the NSW Supreme Court have an onerous task during their deliberations over the Folbigg appeal. Is Kathleen Folbigg Australia’s worst serial killer of children? Or is she an innocent mother torn between expert opinions, the uncertainty of SIDS and a criminal justice system that may have wrongfully imprisoned her for crimes she never committed? 

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

33 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Bernie Matthews is a convicted bank robber and prison escapee who has served time for armed robbery and prison escapes in NSW (1969-1980) and Queensland (1996-2000). He is now a journalist. He is the author of Intractable published by Pan Macmillan in November 2006.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Bernie Matthews
Photo of Bernie Matthews
Article Tools
Comment 33 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy