Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

How highly taxed are we?

By Peter Burn - posted Tuesday, 30 November 2004


From any point of view other than a Eurocentric one, Australia is not a low-taxing country. We should call a spade a spade. With a level of taxation that is 31.5 per cent of GDP, we are high taxing. We are fractionally more highly taxing than the OECD on a weighted average basis and we are well and truly more highly taxing than the seven OECD countries with a Pacific coast.

A close look at the OECD revenue statistics also reveals that Australia has a comparatively high reliance on income taxation. This is true of both the personal and corporate income tax bases. Our use of these tax bases combined (as a proportion of GDP) is more than 50 per cent higher than the weighted average for all of the OECD.

According to the latest OECD data, Australia’s taxation of corporate income (as a proportion of GDP) is the third highest of all OECD members and is more than double the weighted average of these countries.

Advertisement

Australia’s very heavy reliance on income taxation is a threat to Australia’s international competitiveness. This is particularly true in the context of an increasingly global operating environment for business and the ever-expanding opportunities for the employment offshore of highly sought after Australian talent.

Our high use of the income tax base has a number of flow-on effects that further dent our competitive performance. Heavy income taxation requires high marginal rates of income tax. These distort individual decisions relating to workforce participation, saving and investment. They also compound incentives to under-report income and otherwise reduce tax liabilities. These incentives, in turn, incite the taxation authorities to write further complexity into the tax law and add to the growing compliance burden on business and on individuals.

The OECD tax data provide compelling support for those calling for a continuation of the reform of Australian taxation. However, they certainly do not support claims such as Michael Keating’s that Australia could “tolerate a significant increase in the ratio of taxation to GDP without great difficulty”.

On the contrary, a leading risk of a significant rise in the overall level of domestic taxation is an adverse shift in Australia’s competitiveness relative to other developed countries and, most critically, relative to our largest and closest trading partners.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in the Australian Financial Review on November 25, 2004. Available on the Centre for Independent Studies (pdf file 822kb) web site.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Burn is the Associate Director – Public Policy of the Ai Group.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Peter Burn
Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy