Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

When drugs mask our society's failings

By Tanveer Ahmed - posted Friday, 24 September 2004

In this age of hyper-parenting, too many children are under too much pressure.

Psychiatry has always been a mysterious and much-derided science, criticised by psychologists for being too focused on medication, looked down upon by other doctors for being too "wishy-washy", and often accused of being an arm of law and order rather than health and medicine.

The latest figures showing a five-fold increase in the past three years in the prescribing rates of dexamphetamine, the drug often used to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), suggest the profession is trying hard to rid itself of the wishy-washy tag.


But while a host of reasons are given for the syndrome, from dodgy doctors to too much television, the role of desperate parents seeking a "product" to aid their parenting endeavours and, at times, absolve them of some responsibility, is less questioned.

The one million scripts for dexamphetamine filled over the past three years are mainly written for low-income families. ADHD is still a "disease" of poverty in Australia. The vast majority of referrals come from schoolteachers who are no longer able to cope with unruly children. This is understandable. Teachers have so much on their plates that they cannot focus all their energies on one child. And no more needs to be said about the level of resources in Australia's public schools.

There is always some controversy about the diagnosis of ADHD, and there has been no clear link found between it and a biological or genetic abnormality. Diagnostic criteria include such hazy markers as "not able to listen" and "difficulty concentrating during the interview, shown by fidgeting". This decision is always difficult to make in the setting of an hour-long interview.

The doctor, when discussing the problem child with desperate, pleading parents, would like to prescribe better resources in schools to deal with children struggling with learning disabilities, more money to help families on the verge of separation, greater help for victims of child abuse, and better support for those suffering from drug and alcohol addiction. Unfortunately, a doctor cannot prescribe such a remedy. But he can prescribe a drug. And children who use this particular drug often show considerable improvement. The parents are, of course, much happier and the child often engages better with school and family. The side effects are not usually marked.

Nonetheless, it is fairly obvious that ADHD is the "medicalisation" of a social problem. Most sufferers are raised in families of conflict and or poverty, or have parents with a drug problem. While it is unfortunate that we must resort to a drug to treat such a far-reaching issue, the alternative appears to be too difficult and too expensive.

Compared with the massive social spending required to even put a dent in the inexorable march towards family and social breakdown, the $5 million taken from the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) to fund the prescriptions for dexamphetamine is a drop in the ocean.


Furthermore, it is hard for parents to take responsibility for difficult children. Parents will jump at the chance to claim credit if a child succeeds, but they will also happily point to external causes of the same child's failures. We live in an age of hyper-parenting, where a child is the ultimate validation of an adult's ego and the little time they have to spend with them must be "quality time". There is little room for deviance, boredom or unplanned curiosity in the modern child's routine, especially when the parents return home from long hours at work.

In the meantime, medications and video games are increasingly becoming the nannies, grandmothers and babysitters of our children.

With the drug dexamphetamine, psychiatry is once again playing its role in law and order, offering a type of chemical restraint for our difficult children. But it is wrong to blame the doctor or the television when there is such a massive parental demand for the treatment.

It is a consumer response to social degradation.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

First published in The Age April 30, 2004

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

5 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Tanveer Ahmed is a psychiatrist, author and local councillor. His first book is a migration memoir called The Exotic Rissole. He is a former SBS journalist, Fairfax columnist and writes for a wide range of local and international publications.
He was elected to Canada Bay Council in 2012. He practises in western Sydney and rural NSW.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Tanveer Ahmed
Photo of Tanveer Ahmed
Article Tools
Comment 5 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy