Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

When parliament has nowhere to turn

By Philip Heiner - posted Thursday, 20 August 2026


The category can change. The claimed power remains the same.

History suggests that political communities are rarely united on the question of who should be excluded. Views differ across generations, parties and circumstances. The safeguard against arbitrary exclusion is therefore not the popularity of the group affected. The safeguard is the existence of a constitutional limit that government cannot cross.

If no source of power can be identified, and if the institutions responsible for identifying that source refuse to do so, Australia confronts an unsettling possibility. Parliament may be exercising one of the most profound powers imaginable, the power to determine who belongs to the Australian people, without ever demonstrating where that power comes from.

Advertisement

That is the real question confronting Australia.

Not who Parliament chooses to exclude today, but how Parliament acquired the power to exclude at all.

And if neither Parliament, nor the Executive, nor the High Court will answer that question, where does Parliament turn now?

 

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Philip Heiner is Australian by birth and ancestry since the 1800s. Defined ‘alien’ on registering marriage to an Irish citizen in Melbourne, despite never naturalising or owing allegiance to any foreign state. Denied entry to his own and only country, Australia, for asking: what authority made him alien?

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy