Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The failure of the Murray Darling Basin Plan

By David Leyonhjelm - posted Friday, 26 June 2026


The barrages block sea water from entering the lakes, thus ensuring they only contain fresh water from the Murray. This prevents tidal flows from keeping the Murray mouth open, which is now quite silted and requires almost constant dredging.

Somewhere around 800-900 GL simply evaporates in the lower lakes. This is fresh water worth hundreds of millions of dollars in the water trading market, delivered from the eastern states via the Murray River, that evaporates into the atmosphere for zero environmental benefit.

Evaporation is unavoidable, but if the Murray mouth was open and the sea was free to enter the lakes, it could be seawater (or at least a mixture of fresh and seawater) that evaporated instead.

Advertisement

In this unreal world of environmental politics, it is assumed that sending more and more water down the Murray is somehow good for the environment and will keep the Murray mouth open. As is now apparent, this is completely wrong. Water only benefits the environment when it is present in the right place, in the right quantities, at the right time.

Put simply, the MDBP is perpetuating an artificial environment in SA at the expense of Australian farming and rural communities. The loss of water for irrigation in southern Queensland, NSW and Victoria has devastated many regional communities, while its wasteful loss in South Australia is unforgiveable.

Perhaps the environment is marginally better off in a few limited areas but, in terms of overall benefit, it is probably worse off.

What ought to happen is for the SA government to demolish the barrages and remove Bird Island, a sand island that has formed in the mouth of the Murray as a result of the effect of the barrages. This would allow the Murray to run free.

If a new weir was built across the Murray near Wellington to prevent seawater from moving too far up the river and contaminating either Adelaide's supply in dry years, even a repeat of the Millenium Drought would be of no concern. Lakes Albert and Alexandrina would simply become intermittently saline and, with the Murray mouth open, the long-suffering Coorong would recover.

The MDBP was always a political solution to a political problem, but its consequences are not minor. We are long overdue for a dose of non-political reality.

Advertisement

 

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

This article was first published on Liberty Itch.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

David Leyonhjelm is a former Senator for the Liberal Democrats.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by David Leyonhjelm

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of David Leyonhjelm
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy