Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Autism isn’t the problem. The system is.

By Steven Schwartz - posted Tuesday, 31 March 2026


The Australian Productivity Commission found that roughly half of publicly funded care, including accompanied social activities, flows to people with mild or moderate symptoms, while those with severe, life-threatening conditions receive fragmented support or none at all.

Current reform efforts do not address this structural issue. The government has created a new program for children under nine called Thriving Kids and funded it with billions of dollars. Details are sketchy, but even if successful, children over nine who make up more than 80 per cent of those with psychiatric diagnoses will remain within the current mental health system, competing for the same pool of resources. Tightening eligibility criteria alone will not solve the problem. Without altering incentives, it simply produces more elaborate diagnostic justifications.

The NDIS was a well-intentioned scheme created to provide support for people with severe disabilities. Restoring that purpose requires redesign, not administrative reform. Support should be allocated according to functional impairment, whether a person can manage daily living, communicate effectively or sustain employment. This is the method NDIS uses for physical disabilities, and it should apply to psychological ones as well.

Advertisement

Interventions should be limited to those proven to work. Providers should be rewarded for achieving measurable improvement and independence. Assistance for milder presentations should be time-limited and regularly reviewed. As functioning improves, support should step down, freeing resources for people with profound and enduring disabilities.

The $10 billion autism bill is not the disease, but a symptom of a system that rewards diagnosis over disability and expansion over recovery. Until funding is severed from psychiatric diagnoses, the NDIS will continue to expand while those it was designed to protect compete for resources in an increasingly crowded scheme. That is not a design flaw. It is the system working exactly as built.

 

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

This article is republished from Wiser Every Day.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Emeritus Professor Steven Schwartz AM is the former vice-chancellor of Macquarie University (Sydney), Murdoch University (Perth), and Brunel University (London).

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Steven Schwartz

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Steven Schwartz
Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy