Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The Liberals, the senate, and preferences

By David Leyonhjelm - posted Thursday, 12 March 2026


However, the method of voting is not the reason the Coalition has been so dismally unsuccessful in the Senate. They did poorly both before and after the system was changed.

The primary reason is the reluctance of the Liberals (as the dominant party in the Coalition) to establish beneficial relationships with minor parties on the right.

The party’s attitude, mostly found among its national and state directors rather than its elected representatives, is that any party that competes for primary votes is a foe, irrespective of any assistance they might provide via preferences.

Advertisement

There is also little interest in helping a candidate from a sympathetic minor party win a Senate seat rather than Labor or the Greens, if the Liberals cannot win it themselves

There have been exceptions – a couple of minor parties that supported them on every vote – but the contrast with Labor is stark. While Labor has always been open to negotiating with other parties, somewhat irrespective of policies or history, the Liberals engage reluctantly if at all. And when they do it is often too late, being close to the election when deals with other parties are already in place.

Their treatment of my party, the Liberal Democrats (now Libertarian Party), illustrates their thinking. Not only were they always reluctant to engage on the issue of preferences, in 2021 they changed the law to prevent my party from having the word “liberal” in its name. That cost the Liberals many preferences. The architect of the change was a former state director.

Under the group voting ticket system the Liberals could probably have won several more Senate seats if they had negotiated preference deals with some of the many minor parties. They not only did not know how to do this; they did not want to.

Under the Turnbull system, preferences are mostly exchanged via how-to-vote cards, which many voters automatically follow. If they had negotiated deals with minor parties on these, there is similarly a good chance the Coalition could have won more Senate seats.

Whether the Liberals can recover from their current malaise to regain government is a moot point at the moment, with One Nation snapping at their heels. But even if they do, unless they adjust their thinking to the realities of the voting system they introduced, their ability to govern will continue to be severely compromised.

Advertisement

 

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

This article was first published by Liberty Itch.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

1 post so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

David Leyonhjelm is a former Senator for the Liberal Democrats.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by David Leyonhjelm

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of David Leyonhjelm
Article Tools
Comment 1 comment
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy