Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Attacking world electricity poverty

By Ronald Stein and Jimmie Dollard - posted Thursday, 8 January 2026


It's disheartening that the wealthier country governments have chosen electricity generation "winners", i.e., wind and solar, to generate electricity, paid with taxpayer funds, to support the Government Mandates and Subsidies. These actions are unethical to the entire population of 8 billion on this planet, and an insult to the taxpayers in those wealthy countries.

Rather than pursuing the most reliable sources of electricity generation that are also continuous and uninterruptible like nuclear, hydro, coal, or natural gas, wealthier countries are pursuing, with taxpayer dollars, the least reliable source of electricity generation that is also NOT continuous nor reliable, via weather dependent wind turbines and solar panels. Obviously, wealthier countries are pursuing the MOST expensive ways to generate electricity, while those in poverty don't have enough money to subsidize themselves out of a paper bag.

In pursuit of net zero emissions, the Western governments have committed to shuttering reliable fossil plants that are absolutely required to backup wind and solar. If these shuttering's continue as planned, blackouts and grid failure and serious damage could result.

Advertisement

The Western world has spent trillions of dollars on unreliable wind and solar to replace reliable sources of electricity. Wind and solar still produce less than 10% of world electricity. They plan to commit trillions more attempting to eliminate fossil fuels. This is impossible because wind and solar are unreliable and can ONLY generate electricity but cannot replace the 6,000 products and transportation fuels based on fossil fuels. These wasted trillions of dollars could be used to save millions of lives and to pull billions of poor people out of energy poverty.

The world can be divided into wealthy countries and poor countries; those with reliable electricity and those without. Modern societies depend on electricity. To comprehend this, imagine your life after a sudden loss of electricity.

  • Homes would not have lights, TV, cell phones, cooking, refrigeration, computers, and no heating or air conditioning.
  • Homes would freeze in the winter and be hot in the summer.
  • The most urgent problem people would face would be the loss of water because the water treatment plants run on electricity.
  • People can live only three days without drinking water, and they cannot shower, wash their hands, or flush the toilet.

In a city without electricity:

  • There are no stores open so there's no food.
  • Gas pumps don't work, credit cards don't work,
  • Traffic lights don't work; nothing works.
  • Imagine high rise apartments without lights, water, AC, or elevators, and toilets that don't flush.

It would be catastrophic if any modern society lost electricity, but the number of people WITHOUT electricity access was about 730 million in 2024.

Advertisement
  • Those in poverty desperately need and want electricity to lift themselves out of poverty.
  • Those in poverty want what we have; reliable electricity to provide all the wonderful benefits of modern life enjoyed by those in wealthy countries.

Poverty means:

  • Poor diet, poor health, shorter life span expectancy, minimum education, and other hazards.
  • Child mortality in Africa is 14 times higher than in Europe.
  • Another result of poverty: over three million people die annually from lung disease caused by 2.1 billion women cooking over open fires using wood, charcoal, crop residue, waste or dung.

Three million dying from lung disease in poverty locations is just a number, right? Stalin once said "One life is a tragedy, a million lives is just a statistic". But let's put three million into perspective. When there is a tragic airplane crash in wealthy countries killing several people, it makes news for days and initiates thorough investigations.

More people die annually in poverty around the world from cooking over open fires than would die if an airliner with 320 passengers crashed every hour of the day, and every day of the year. Of course, the world should not tolerate that, yet we still have three million deaths per year from cooking over open fires.

Other analogies to put three million deaths annually into perspective:

  • That is more deaths annually than have died in all the natural disasters in the 21st Century.
  • Three million is also ten times the deaths caused by the entire Russian/Ukraine war (high estimate is 300,000).
  • Tragically, almost an equal number of three million die in poverty from communicable diseases caused by unsafe drinking water and lack of sanitation facilities.

Because of the immensity of these tragedies, the world needs to mount a major effort by all the countries, foundations, financial institutions and corporations of the world to bring LPG stoves, safe water and electricity to the poor of the world. The LPG stoves could be provided faster and with less funding, so should be done while continuous and uninterruptible electricity is being built out.

Most countries in Africa have good fossil fuel reserves so why don't Africans have electricity? One of the reasons, besides poverty, is because for five decades or more, Western World governments, and a loose cabal of financial institutions including the UN and World bank have blocked financing fossil fuel systems in the developing world. At the Africa summit in Washington earlier this year, Secretary Chris Wright said:

Western countries such as the United States have for years been "shamelessly" telling Africa that coal is bad and not to develop it. That's just nonsense, 100 percent nonsense…Coal transformed our world and made it better, extended life expectancy and grew opportunities, and coal globally will be the largest source of electricity for decades to come. That's not a policy, that's not a desire, that's just a reality.

Globally there are 3 billion people using less electricity annually than required to run a standard refrigerator, many are limited to one tenth that. The availability of limited electricity has been a great leap forward because it has provided communication and minimum lighting, but it is totally inadequate to support industry. Eliminating poverty requires jobs, and jobs require industry, and that requires cheap reliable electricity.

Surprisingly, these poor people have cell phones, so they are aware of the wonderful benefits from electricity in the developed world and are determined to get it. This pent-up demand has created a huge market for electricity in the developing world. It is urgently needed now, so initially it must be fossil fuels like coal and natural gas, but nuclear should be included as quickly as possible.

The World bank says there are now 720 million living in extreme poverty defined as less than $3/day. To combat poverty, we need jobs and good industrial jobs require cheap, reliable electricity.

Wealthy countries should stop pursuing the least reliable source of electricity generation that is NOT continuous nor reliable, via weather dependent wind turbines and solar panels, and should focus on improving the well-being of the billions on this planet who live in poverty. That positive direction for ALL of mankind will vastly increase the demand for, and thus the energy associated with, all conventional products and services from home heating and cooling, to transportation, healthcare, and more.

 

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All

This article was first published by American Out Loud News.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

12 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Ronald Stein is co-author of the Pulitzer Prize nominated book Clean Energy Exploitations. He is a policy advisor on energy literacy for the Heartland Institute, and the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, and a national TV commentator on energy & infrastructure with Rick Amato.

Jimmie Dollard worked for 20 years as a systems engineer and manager in aerospace, then for four years with USDOE in solar energy. He left DOE to form and serve as president of a solar energy company. He then formed and served as president of a nuclear and environmental consulting firm. Since retiring he has enjoyed researching climate, energy, and human conditions in the world. He recently wrote Switched, an adventure novel about energy, wealth and poverty.

Other articles by these Authors

All articles by Ronald Stein
All articles by Jimmie Dollard

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Ronald SteinRonald SteinPhoto of Jimmie DollardJimmie Dollard
Article Tools
Comment 12 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy