Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Gender-affirming care for minors under fire

By Maryanne Demasi - posted Tuesday, 13 May 2025


These include infertility, sexual dysfunction, impaired bone development, elevated cardiovascular risk, and psychiatric complications.

"The physical consequences are often irreversible," the report warns.

Puberty blockers, frequently marketed as a reversible 'pause,' actually interrupt bone mineralisation at a critical growth stage-raising the risk of stunted skeletal growth and early-onset osteoporosis.

Advertisement

When followed by cross-sex hormones, as is common, the harms multiply. Known risks include metabolic disruption, blood clots, sterility, and permanent loss of sexual function.

Yet many clinics operate under a "child-led care" model, where a minor's self-declared "embodiment goals" dictate treatment.

The report notes that some leading clinics conduct assessments "in a single session lasting two hours," often with no robust psychological evaluation.

This raises a critical question: Are children capable of consenting to life-altering medical interventions?

According to the HHS, informed consent means more than simple agreement-it requires a deep understanding of risks, alternatives, and long-term impact.

And by definition, children lack full legal and developmental capacity for medical decision-making.

Advertisement

"When medical interventions pose unnecessary, disproportionate risks of harm, healthcare providers should refuse to offer them even when they are preferred, requested, or demanded by patients," the report states.

Supportive parents cannot shield clinicians from ethical responsibility. Many children who present for transition also have autism, trauma histories, depression, or anxiety-all of which can impair decision-making.

Yet clinicians frequently misread a child's desire to transition as evidence of capacity.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. All

This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

6 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Maryanne Demasi, 2023 Brownstone Fellow, is an investigative medical reporter with a PhD in rheumatology, who writes for online media and top tiered medical journals. For over a decade, she produced TV documentaries for the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) and has worked as a speechwriter and political advisor for the South Australian Science Minister.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Maryanne Demasi
Article Tools
Comment 6 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy