Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

My plan to cut tax is feasible

By Malcolm Turnbull - posted Monday, 5 September 2005


A system with three brackets: 15 per cent, 29 per cent and 40 per cent would cost, at most, about $3.8 billion in 2006-07. It would deliver almost all taxpayers a cut. The top 20 per cent of income earners would get a 4.5 per cent cut, the next 20 per cent a 3 per cent cut. Even the bottom 60 per cent (who on our figures will pay about 15 per cent of the total tax take in 2006-07) would get a tax cut. Because most taxpayers are in the 30 per cent bracket, the 1 per cent cut in that bracket would cost about the same as the 7 per cent cut in the top brackets.

As we discuss in our paper, means-testing of benefits has the consequence that welfare is withdrawn as income is earned. The combination of a withdrawal of benefits and the imposition of income tax can result in high effective marginal tax rates for low-income earners moving from welfare to work. There is no silver bullet for this problem; it is inherent in any means-tested welfare system. But some relief can be given by lowering tax rates in the bottom bracket (as was done in the previous budget with the reduction in the 17 per cent rate to 15 per cent) or by lifting the tax-free threshold.

Lifting the tax-free threshold is very expensive because it benefits every taxpayer, not just those on low incomes. But one reform package that delivers broad tax cuts would involve raising the tax-free threshold to $10,000, and then dropping the top rate to 40 per cent. That would cost (at most) $7.5 billion. The top 20 per cent would get a 5 per cent tax cut, as would the next 20 per cent. The last 60 per cent would get a 26 per cent tax cut. And of course EMTRs would be reduced.

Advertisement

If the top rate reduction was increased to bring it down to 35 per cent, the cost would increase to $11 billion and the top 20 per cent would get an 11 per cent tax cut, the next 20 per cent a 5 per cent tax cut and the last 60 per cent would get 26 per cent tax cut.

But because of the big impact a change to thresholds has on those on lower incomes, the share of total personal income tax paid by the top 40 per cent of taxpayers would increase.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in The Australian on September 2, 2005.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

12 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Malcolm Turnbull is is the federal Leader of the Opposition and member for Wentworth. You can see his web site here: www.malcolmturnbull.com.au

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Malcolm Turnbull

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Malcolm Turnbull
Article Tools
Comment 12 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy