Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Can anyone tell me the difference between a 'slut' and a 'stud'?

By Leslie Cannold - posted Friday, 28 May 2004

Has anyone been listening to the lyrics of Eminem lately? The man is obsessed about the sexual morays of his lady friends. And women just can’t win with this guy. First he tells them that if they don’t put out, he’s going to “put them out,” while in the next breath he’s dismissing them as beneath contempt for sleeping with him on the same day they met. The rap superstar is also pretty direct about his lack of respect for women who offer to worship at his altar (if you get my drift) when all they know about him is that he’s a lead singer of a band.

It sort of reminds me of the excuses being made for the male athletes accused of sexual assault: that when women keep throwing themselves at them, what can you expect such virile blokes to do?

It’s happening again. In the media and across popular entertainment, young women are being informed – in ways subtle and not so – that they’re acting like sluts. They are being told in no uncertain terms that if they “give” sex to a guy just because he’s the lead cock in the coop, they’re “dissing” themselves. And if women lack respect for themselves, how can they expect men will respect them?


The message seems to be that if young women are going to stay out late with their skirts up to pussy’s bow and their tongues hanging out, they shouldn’t be surprised when all they find is trouble.

How fair is the slut charge? It’s certainly accurate to say that some young women engage in casual sex with high status men. I’ve got male friends who are or have been musicians. The stories they tell about their female fans make Eminem’s tales seem tame.

But if women cheapen themselves by having brief and loveless encounters with men they don’t know but are attracted to for superficial reasons, then so do men. What’s the difference between a woman who “gets with” a guy because he’s high status, and a bloke bedding a woman because he likes her breasts, her long legs or the winning way she laughs at his unfunny jokes? The bottom line, in other words, is that if young women are acting like sluts, then young men are too.

The real question is whether both sexes ought to be condemned for sluttish behaviour, whether as a society we ought to condemn as possibly risky but certainly unwise sex between young people that is devoid of emotional intimacy, trust, responsibility, mutuality and respect? Should we say loudly and clearly to young people (or perhaps all people) that it is foolhardy to engage in one of the most physically intimate acts of which humans are capable with people we don’t know well, or to whom we are attracted for the shallowest of reasons?

I’m in two minds about this. On one hand, I feel sure there are some young people, as well as older ones, who can not only handle the costs but truly enjoy the benefits of what Erica Jong famously referred to as the "zipless f***". Why should people be made to feel bad if all they want at a particular time of their life is casual sex, as long as they are ruthlessly honest about this with their partners and make sure a condom is at hand?

On the other hand, I remain sceptical about the idea that for most people, most of the time, sex is ever that easy. There is good evidence that human beings are hard-wired to connect physical and emotional intimacy or, to use common parlance, to find that sex brings them closer. Avoiding such intimacy demands an emotional distancing and mental compartmentalisation - a cutting off of body from mind and from feeling - that not only undermines the self but dehumanises the living, breathing, dreaming person beside you. As Jong herself put it, “The zipless f*** is … rarer than the unicorn. And I have never had one.”


Perhaps the bottom line is that while women have the same right as men to act like sluts, this may not always be the right thing for either sex to do.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

Article edited by Merrindahl Andrew.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

1 post so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Leslie Cannold is a writer, columnist, ethicist and academic researcher. She is the author of the award-winning What, No Baby? and The Abortion Myth. Her historical novel The Book of Rachael was published in April by Text.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Leslie Cannold
Related Links
Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics
Photo of Leslie Cannold
Article Tools
Comment 1 comment
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy