Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

My Armenian experience suggests ten principles of social action

By Armen Gakavian - posted Friday, 21 May 2004


I have spent the past few years working in the post-Soviet republic of Armenia. Sandwiched between Turkey, Georgia, Iran and Azerbaijan, Armenia is an ancient nation that has survived centuries of conquest and genocide. After 70 years as part of the Soviet Union, Armenia gained independence in 1991.

Armenia’s road to independence and beyond, however, has been a rocky one. An earthquake, war, refugees, famine and economic collapse have been exacerbated by the ongoing problems of large-scale emigration, political opportunism and corruption. As a result, Armenia can best be described as a nation in trauma.

In my work among Armenia’s youth, I have seen much to encourage me. Yet alongside the stories of hope and triumph, there are the stories of failure and self-destruction that are just as real. There are days when I feel like throwing in the towel and coming home. So what keeps me going? The answer is hope – but not a "wishful thinking" kind of hope.

Advertisement

Rather, it is the hope that comes from my firm belief in the possibility of social change. As a way of "concretising" this belief, I have drawn up a list of what I call the Ten Principles of Social Action – principles that, if implemented, will lead to deep-rooted social change. I cannot claim full originality for these principles; rather, they are drawn from various historical models of social action, as embodied in people such as Jesus Christ, Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr.

I believe that the first and most fundamental principle of social action is that social change is in fact possible. Lois Brandeis has said that: "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." Many Armenians are convinced that social action was tried, tested and failed during the independence movement of 1987-1991. However, if it is true that those who govern do so by the consent of the governed, then there is a huge force in Armenia that has yet to be unleashed for the purpose of radical social change.

Second, any social action must first start with our selves. I often hear from Armenians that, if only the government would change, things would improve. However, the recognition that social change must start with our selves is both liberating and empowering. In contrast, to place the blame for all of society’s ills on politicians and big business is to disempower the oppressed and make them dependant on the actions of the "big end of town" to deliver them from their problems.

The third principle of social action is that one person can and does make a difference. In a society such as Armenia, disempowerment is considered the norm, an inevitable state of affairs. In such an environment, it requires double courage for an individual or group to take the first step towards social change. But it only takes a few people who are willing to act contrary to the tide to encourage others to act.

The fourth principle of social action is that change almost always starts with small things. The way we do the "little" things is an indicator of our capacity to do the bigger things. Social change cannot be achieved without the willingness to go through the hard slog of incremental, small-scale change.

The fifth principle of social action is that, although social action starts small and with one person, ultimately collective effort and mass action are needed for stronger, more effective and long term social change. In my work among young professionals in Armenia, I have found that the most important step that is taken in the development of a community project is when the project moves from being one person’s dream to a team effort. The sense of community, the ability to work together and the sense of common values that is developed in this process provide the "building blocks" of the new society that is envisaged.

Advertisement

The sixth principle of social action is that any change comes at a cost. There is always a person (or persons) who have paid a price for the freedoms and privileges we enjoy today. On all counts there is a great personal cost to getting involved in social action. Yet the cost of not getting involved is higher – that is, the cost to our conscience, and the cost to those around us whose liberation depends on our actions.

The seventh principle of social action is that the means are as important as the ends. In response to the suggestion that terrorist tactics should be adopted in the campaign against the British, Gandhi argued that a democratic order could not be established through violence: "The spirit of democracy cannot be established in the midst of terrorism, whether governmental or popular."

On 27 October 1999, five gunmen stormed into the Armenian National Assembly and killed the Prime Minister, President of the Parliament and six deputies. The assassins called upon the Armenian people to rise up against the country’s leadership; instead, the assassinations simply compounded and entrenched the sense of public demoralisation. Violent acts rarely lead to their intended result. If the goal of social action is the creation of a more just, egalitarian, peaceful and harmonious social order, then violence is not an appropriate means to achieving this end.

The use of violence creates winners and losers, which sows the seeds for counter violence.

This brings us to the eighth principle of social action, which is that social action must always seek, as far as is possible, to create a win-win outcome for all. The oppressors must always be given the opportunity to cease their oppressive behaviour, to recover their own humanity. Thus the aim, method and outcome of social action must be consciously geared towards transformation, rather than punishment. I have tried to keep this principle in mind in my own dealings with people in power in Armenia. In many cases, I have found that a mixture of patient perseverance, firm confrontation and steps taken to show that the outcome would be to the benefit of all, have opened the way to working together towards change.

The ninth principle of social action is that the process of social action is as important as the outcome. The values developed and skills learned during the process of social action are valuable in and of them selves, whether or not the desired outcome is achieved. Final year students at Armenia’s Center for Leadership Development are required to dream of, plan and implement a community project. As I help students through this process, I point them to the importance of what they gain along the way, explaining that the skills that they have developed will allow them to dream, plan and implement other projects in the future.

The tenth, and final, principle of social action is that, although the outcome of social action is not always guaranteed in the short term, persistent social action sows the seeds for future social change. What we do now may simply be our contribution to the long-term process of social change. However tempting it may be to throw in the towel and walk away, to do so will make it harder for those who come after us. Every small action taken, and every individual and group mobilised, prepares the way for social change, either now or in the future.

As I work to bring about social change in Armenia, I find in these principles the strength to start small and think big. I find the motivation to stand alongside those who love their country and their fellow human beings unconditionally. And I find the hope with which to invest in the people who are committed to bringing about change, driven by a vision to build a better future for Armenia and the world.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Article edited by Ian Miller.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.

This article was first published in Peace Writes, May 2004, published by the Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies, University of Sydney.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Armen Gakavian is a graduate of the Department of Government at Sydney University, and a CPACS life member. He has recently returned from Armenia where he spent an extended time working among university students, teaching sociology and Christian spirituality, consulting with NGOs and empowering the young generation to see the possibility of social change. He is currently teaching a course on social theory at the Macquarie Christian Studies Institute, and plans to return to Armenia later in the year.

Related Links
Armenia's Center for Leadership Development
Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy