Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Australia's troubled future

By Keith Suter - posted Tuesday, 13 July 2021


The IGR itself steers clear of controversial economic suggestions. But it is valuable in trying to change the current sterile public debate from just discussing government debt to saying there should be more attention to productivity.

A second implication is how to increase skilled migration without an anti-immigrant backlash? There is a global race for talent. Australia for the last two centuries has used immigration to stimulate economic growth. This process needs to continue (even though some politicians and media commentators are opposed to it). For example, post-COVID Australia will need to revive its standing in international education: could overseas students be offered the opportunity of staying permanently in Australia after the successful completion of their university degree?
Third, how to pay for the increased health, education and welfare (HEW)? There are two main choices. Either the government reduces HEW expenditure and/or it increases taxation, such taking the GST to 15%; the GST is in theory very easy increase but would be politically very unpopular.

Fourth, how to increase workforce participation? For example, there could be more paid childcare and/or more parental leave (to give parents an incentive to have children).

Advertisement

Finally, the big omission from the 2021 IGR is (still) any attempt to quantify the impact of climate change. Climate change is the elephant in the room, such as the risk of storm damage along the Australian coast and the problem of coastal erosion. Ironically, a few weeks after the IGR appeared, there was a building collapse on the coast in Florida which cost 54 dead with 86 unaccounted for. Climate change contributed to that tragedy.

To conclude, the IGR is an important document. It encourages us to look four decades into the future, and to think more about increasing Australia's productivity. It may seem a gloomy document but Australia is a much better county in which to grow old than many other societies. China, for example, may grow old before it grows rich.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

26 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Keith Suter is a futurist, thought leader and media personality in the areas of social policy and foreign affairs. He is a prolific and well-respected writer and social commentator appearing on radio and television most weeks.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Keith Suter

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Keith Suter
Article Tools
Comment 26 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy