Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

China's rivers of sand

By Felix Imonti - posted Thursday, 26 November 2020

With twenty percent of the world's population China has only seven percent of the fresh water. It, though, controls the fresh water needed by three billion people in Asia and will not share it.

As Chinese troops swept into Korea in 1950, Mao Zedong was seizing control of Xinjiang and Tibet and gained control of the head waters of six rivers which come from the mountains of Tibet and are needed by nearly fifty percent of the world's population.

Two of the rivers, the Yangzi and the Yellow are critical to China with five hundred and eighty million Chinese dependent upon the Yangzi. The Yellow River has in seventy years lost ninety percent of its flow, which is symptomatic of what has turned into a national crisis. Over the last. Quarter century, the rapid industrialization and urbanization of the People's Republic of China has resulted in twenty-eight thousand bodies of surface water disappearing. Seventy percent is being directed to agriculture, and fifteen percent to resource extraction and industrial processes. If new sources cannot be located, resource industries, such as rare earth processing that uses a great deal of water and manufacturing will suffer.


Mao Zedong was aware in 1952 of the poor distribution of water with eighty percent in the south and two thirds of agricultural production in the North. To redistribute the water, he advocated what has become a seventy-billion-dollar canal system. The South-to-North Water Diversion project is transferring water through a twelve hundred kilometer canal system to the Beijing region, but the additional water is simply serving as a stop gap until other sources are located. Late in the game, the Chinese have come to realize that they have been squandering their scarce resource by allowing extensive pollution from agricultural run off and industrial waste. Half of the population does not have access to safe water with ninety percent of cities depending upon polluted underground water. Fifty cities, including Beijing, are experiencing land subsidence due to the exhausting of the underground water.

Former premier Wen Jiabao, said that "the very survival of the Chinese nation is threatened by lack of a water supply." Already, China is seeking a solution by tapping the flow of the four major rivers that supply the nine bordering countries, the Mekong, the Brahmaputra, the Indus and the Ganges. Eleven damns have been constructed on the Mekong. Seventy million people in Thailand, Myanmar, Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam rely upon the river. China controls the headwaters and Beijing is showing little interest in the impact down stream. By the time, the river reaches Vietnam, it is scarcely more than a trickle.

Next on the agenda is the Brahmaputra. In August, Jiacha Dam, the second hydro electric dam was completed and future dams are expected to begin directing the water through alternate channels to replenish the Yellow River.

With only three percent of the Indian population dependent upon the river, its real value is political. India is developing the river in Arunachal Pradesh along the Tibetan frontier. The ninety thousand square kilometer territory is claimed by China as Southern Tibet and Beijing objects to any project that indicates that Delhi intends to remain.

Delhi is accusing China of supporting a fifth column in the form of a separatist movement, the United Liberation Front of Assam. The long neglected impoverished region is linked to Western India by a narrow corridor known as the Chicken's Neck. If China severs the corridor, India lacks the means to reclaim its territory and many of the ethnic minorities will not oppose separation from the rest of India.

More than India, China has invested in a rail and road network in the high mountains and is backing land forces with aircraft from local air fields. A skirmish in the Galan Valley near the Chicken's Neck in June when twenty Indian soldiers were killed is a warning to Delhi that is building a new all-weather highway through the territory that China sets the rules of engagement.


India is facing the underground movement in Assam, the Chinese forces with their more advanced weaponry near the Galan Valley and Pakistan ground units along the Kashmir frontier as well as a Pakistani supported insurgency inside of Indian control Kashmir. Should there be a coordinated assault by the Chinese and Pakistani armies, India will face another defeat at the hands of the Chinese as had happened in 1962 when Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru asked President John Kennedy for military assistance. The collapse of the Indian army was so thorough that it appears as if the PLA would push all of the way to the Bay of Bengal, until Washington intervened. Aid from the U.S. and from the U.K rescued India, although China did keep forty thousand square kilometers at Ladakh and is claiming even more of the territory.

Facing an economic contraction and a far more powerful China, Prime Minister Narendra Modi after hesitating for several years has decided to join the Quad, an alliance with Japan, the U.S. and with Australia to deter China. Alone, China views India as an inferior rival. Linked in an alliance with the U.S. changes the equation and is leaving China with a dilemma. Is the need to acquire water worth the risk of a war with nuclear armed India and potentially the United States with which China is experiencing hostile relations. Chairman Xi Jinping is the man with the answer.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Felix Imonti is a retired director of a private equity firm and currently lives in Canada. He has recently published the book Violent Justice, and regularly writes articles in the fields of economics and international politics.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Felix Imonti

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy