Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

What do Tattersall’s corporate affairs people think they are doing?

By James Doughney - posted Wednesday, 31 March 2004


When problematic gamblers recall being in the mental state they call “the zone”, they describe an absence of rationality. The virtue of truth about what they are doing has long been forgotten. Nothing else exists in “the zone” other than the relationship with the machine. Neither friends nor family matter. The infernal sound of the pre-programmed drip-fed win alone is sufficient motivation to continue.

In reality problem or heavy gamblers do not experience reasonable hope. What they describe instead is alternating emotions of despair and delusion. Tattersall’s and Tabcorp prey on the despair by manufacturing the delusion, unconscionably in my view. The only hope here is false hope.

This brings me to my third point. Read Black and Ramsey’s last sentence carefully: “A gambling industry that took itself seriously could undo the harm done and discover its real potential to contribute to human fulfilment and the common good.” Call me perverse, but I infer this to be saying that the gambling giants currently are not, in practice, behaving altogether ethically, are harming potential human fulfilment and are not contributing to the common good.

Advertisement

What on earth was Tattersall’s thinking of?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

Article edited by Susan Prior.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.

This articles was first published in The Age on 26 March 2004.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr James Doughney is Senior Researcher, Work and Economic Policy Research Unit at Victoria University and author of The Poker Machine State: Dilemmas in Ethics Economics and Governance.

Related Links
Responsible Gaming at Tattersall's
Work and Economic Policy Research Unit
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy