Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Is Trump going the way of Herbert Hoover?

By Keith Suter - posted Wednesday, 29 July 2020

Four years ago, in discussing the 2016 US presidential election, I noted that Donald Trump would be, if elected, the first businessperson in the White House since Herbert Hoover (1929-33). (Most presidents come from the political class with a sprinkling of generals). Hoover was one of the world's youngest richest business executives just prior to World War I, partly because of his gold mining career in Western Australia.

But I would then joke that, despite his brilliant business career, Hoover presided over the slide into the Great Depression. Would Trump go the same way?

We now know the answer to that question.


Republican president Hoover served only one term as president. Trump runs the risk of going the same way as Hoover.

In 2016 Trump pulled off the greatest electoral surprise since Harry Truman's re-election in 1948. He spoke to a lot of Americans who felt ignored by the standard political class in both the Democratic and Republican parties. He promised to get out of the foreign wars of Bush and Obama, to revive the coal industry, and bring manufacturing back to the US. He promised to "drain the Washington swamp" of corrupt politics. This was a message that resonated with many Americans (despite his poor personal life).

Four years on, the US is still bogged down in foreign wars (and with a continued high rate of defence expenditure), the coal industry is still being killed by market pressures (investors are worried that coal could become a "stranded asset"), and there has not been a dramatic return of manufacturing back to the US. He has himself become part of the "Washington swamp" of corrupt politics – perhaps one of the most corrupt administrations in US history.

On top of those failures, there is now worry about the corona virus. The US has five per cent of the world's population and 25 per cent of the world's corona virus deaths.

Trump, as recently as February 2020, expected to go into the November election, boasting of the high rate of economic growth. (Whether the right indices are being used is another matter – Wall Street is not Main Street). Never the less, the media used Wall Street's remarkable figures as a guide to the strength of the US economy and those figures supported Trump's claims.

All of the three years of economic progress made under Trump then disappeared in less than two months. The US is now in a very bad recession – probably the worst since Hoover's Great Depression.


No US president has ever been re-elected in a recession (1932: Hoover, 1980: Carter, and 1992: George Bush senior). Trump hoped that he could somehow talk up the economy by talking down the extent of the corona crisis. He underestimated the risks of the virus (something the Australian and New Zealand governments did not do and so helped make their situations less dangerous).

Trump's language is now starting to change. He is less of a "booming economy" president, and more of a "wartime" president battling the "invisible enemy of the Wuhan virus".

Every president since 1812 who had a re-election campaign in a war, has been re-elected (for example, 1812: James Madison, 1864: Abraham Lincoln, and 1944: Franklin Roosevelt). Americans rally around the flag in a war and so decide that changing horses mid-stream would be wrong.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

17 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Keith Suter is a futurist, thought leader and media personality in the areas of social policy and foreign affairs. He is a prolific and well-respected writer and social commentator appearing on radio and television most weeks.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Keith Suter

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Keith Suter
Article Tools
Comment 17 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy