Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

'Inequality in a dog collar': how the Religious Discrimination Bill hands more power to the powerful

By Rodney Croome - posted Monday, 21 October 2019


And what they want is for the state to help them reassert their influence over society.

Yes, they say they want they want their rights guaranteed so they are protected from the state interfering in their lives, but what they actually want is to use the power of the state to increase their control over the lives of others.

If they are given the right to discriminate they will use it to re-impose the shame they think should attach to being gay, trans, a single mother, a divorcee, a person with disability, and maybe even an interracial couple.

Advertisement

Invigorated by their success in rolling back discrimination law, and wielding their new power and status, they will seek to punch holes in other important reforms and stop new ones.

They will pull the classic trick of theocrats and authoritarians everywhere; having gained access to status and power through the door marked "freedom and rights" they will slam that door on everyone else.

Freedom for the few

They will be particularly tyrannical towards their own congregations.

Don't be fooled by religious leaders who claim to be acting on behalf of those congregations: "Religious freedom" is for the clerical 1%, not their flocks.

Sure, "religious freedom" and "free speech" are sold to everyday parishioners as being to their benefit.

Advertisement

But the deregulation of faith-based hate only benefits the religious few who decide what doctrine to impose on others, not the many who have neither the means nor desire to stigmatise their fellow citizens.

"Religious freedom" is like tax cuts for billionaires. Very little trickles down.

Instead, it is about the Big End of Church elevating its power over, and enforcing greater doctrinal conformity on, everyday parishioners.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

28 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Rodney Croome is a spokesperson for Equality Tasmania and national advocacy group, just.equal. He who was made a Member of the Order of Australia in 2003 for his LGBTI advocacy.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Rodney Croome

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 28 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy