Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The shameful neglect of Australia's legacy of space facilities

By Brendan O'Reilly - posted Tuesday, 23 July 2019


Speaking at a White House event honouring Apollo 11, Buzz Aldrin, the second man to walk on the Moon, saidhe was "disappointed" with the progress America's space program had made over the past 50 years. Australia also ought to have its own regrets, except that most people are unaware of what happened in this country following the wind down of the US space program in the 1970s and 1980s.

During celebrations over the past week of the anniversary of the Moon landing, Australians have engaged in a round of "back-slapping" about our nation's contribution. This stems from the role of the Honeysuckle Creek (ACT) and Parkes (NSW) tracking stations in broadcasting the first walks on the Moon.

The Department of Industry, Innovation and Science trumpets on its website that:

Advertisement

…the Apollo Moon program was an enormous feat of technological ingenuity...

and that

…many nations, including Australia, contributed to its success. By 1969, Australia hosted the greatest number of NASA tracking stations outside the US, employing around 700 people.

Australian tracking stations played important roles in the Apollo 11 mission. The Carnarvon station provided the 'go/no go' confirmation that sent the Apollo spacecraft out of Earth orbit and on its way to the Moon. Honeysuckle Creek and Tidbinbilla, in the ACT, provided vital telecommunications and telemetry links throughout the mission. During the operations at the Moon, Tidbinbilla supported the Command Module, Columbia, in lunar orbit, while Honeysuckle Creek maintained contact with the Lunar Module. Carnarvon, Honeysuckle Creek and the Orroral Valley tracking station received the data from scientific instruments that the astronauts left on the Moon.

While Australia played its part in 1969, we need reminding of how Australia (especially the ACT) squandered its heritage from NASA.

During the space race in the 1960s, NASA built the three key tracking stations south of Canberra, at Honeysuckle Creek, Orroral Valley and Tidbinbilla. The first two are within the Namadgi National Park, which was subsequently established in 1984. Honeysuckle Creek, located in the Brindabella Range 30 km south of Canberra, had a 26-metre dish, purpose-built for the Apollo missions. With sister stations near Goldstone in California and Madrid, Spain, between them they could keep contact with a distant spacecraft. All three Australian stations were locally staffed and managed by the then Department of Supply.

In the mid-1980s two of the ACT's three tracking stations, Orroral and Honeysuckle Creek, were officially closed following the wind down of the Apollo program. Equipment dismantling and removal was undertaken, with some equipment moved to the nearby Tidbinbilla tracking station.

Advertisement

Although there had been proposals to preserve the sites and equipment, nothing was actually done to preserve the complexes (which would have cost millions to build). They were instead left to a fate of severe vandalism for several years, and by the early 1990s the damage was so severe that all the structures were bulldozed. Orroral had previously been the largest tracking station in the world outside of the United States, and at one time had staff levels of over 200.

At ceremonies at Honeysuckle Creek (now little more than a camping ground) over the past week, dignitaries had only the concrete slab and some signs to look at.

It is hard to believe that in 2016, almost 48 years after the moon landing, and almost a quarter of a century after the site was levelled, the Honeysuckle Creek tracking station (ironically) was added to the ACT's heritage register, and was joined by the (similarly-cleared) sites of the Orroral Valley tracking station and the geodetic observatory nearby. Talk about too little, too late, and bureaucratic hypocrisy.

The destruction of our heritage from NASA is a great shame on the government of the ACT and (even more so) its predecessor, the Commonwealth Department of Territories. I know of a number of community groups that had been interested in using the buildings. Rumour had it that there was an unofficial (green?) agenda at the time to deliberately allow the facilities to decay in order for the sites to revert to natural bush.

With changing times, the space industry is again back in fashion with government and bureaucracy in Australia.

Australia's latest policy on space involved an announcement in 2017 that the Australian Government would be launching a national space agency. In the 2018 Budget $26m in seed funding over four years was allocated to establish the Australian Space Agency, with a further $15m for international space investment starting from 2019. The budget was criticised for being inadequate by private Australian space companies.

One commentator noted that:

…the 1980s Australian Space Board was managed by a small office within the Department of Industry, Technology and Commerce, but it fizzled out after ten years and we were back to square one. There's a strong feeling in the Australian space community that a substantial investment in a stand-alone agency is the only way to avoid another death by bureaucracy.

On 12 December 2018, Prime Minister announced that Adelaide would become home to the Australian Space Agency.

It is hard to avoid the conclusion that Australia is again attempting too little too late, and that the decision to headquarter in Adelaide was simply another pork barrel to South Australia in the lead-up to the last election. There are now many established players in the space industry internationally so that the prospects for the Australian Space Agency are not good. Nobody much cares anyway. It's just another waste of public money, like the inaction that led to the destruction of the ACT's tracking stations.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Brendan O’Reilly is a retired commonwealth public servant with a background in economics and accounting. He is currently pursuing private business interests.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Brendan O'Reilly

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy