Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

David Brooks strives for the second mountain

By Mark Christensen - posted Thursday, 18 July 2019


I want to be there when everyone suddenly understands what it has all been for. All the religions of the world are built on this longing, and I am a believer.

Western society, then, doesn’t need another self-help manual. Nor a new Republic-cum-Macbeth rendering of veiled reality. People want to know if human suffering serves a higher purpose. Where is the Nietzschean why to ameliorate the terrifying how of genuine faith? Perhaps having a reason for why the leap is so absurd could make the transition to the second mountain less troublesome.

Alas, the dialectal quest for a basis to put heart before head and damn the consequences, what is alluded to today as spiritual but not religious, has arrived at a stalemate, in the form of acute ideological polarization.

Advertisement

The priestly class of global progressives, poor players who strut and fret upon the political and cultural stage, provides no hope for Ivan and other believers. Beholden to a materialism that is ineluctably contemptuous of a loving Creator, it would be heresy to fashion a theodicy. Of course, it is a plausible project for religious intellectuals. But most of these are either exhausted — man is done wrestling with God — or too consumed by the first mountain culture wars to contemplate an ironic interpretation of the activist sound and fury. Rather than see escalating illiberalism within the liberal order as goading those it persecutes, overly cognitive types on the Christian right, such as Sohrab Ahmari, double-down with a proposed return to theocracy.

Brooks is a theological Goldilocks, a well-educated centrist of good humour who doesn’t allow God-talk to crowd out his emotional awareness of the underlying game. He fits the bill when it comes to the cosmic promise of Western civilisation: a universal what’s-it-all-been-for story concerning our shared soul — no doubt a satire — that can redeem history once and for all.

As rewarding as The Second Mountain is, it therefore represents a missed opportunity.

Trouble is, you get the sense our hour upon the stage is almost up.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

This article was first published by ARC.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

6 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mark is a social and political commentator, with a background in economics. He also has an abiding interest in philosophy and theology, and is trying to write a book on the nature of reality. He blogs here.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mark Christensen

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 6 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy