Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Ascertaining motives in the Persian Gulf

By Max Atkinson - posted Wednesday, 3 July 2019


If, for example, Trump fails to win a second term the Senate cannot protect him from conviction as a co-conspirator for obstructing justice, or from criminal charges against his family and business empire. As the noose draws tighter he may in desperation try to avoid or defer years in prison by appealing to patriotism with a strike against either Iran or North Korea.

Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the ruler of Saudi Arabia, has a problem dealing with the fallout from Jamal Kashoggi's murder. He may try to restore (or distract attention from) his own and the nation's conduct with a patriotic war against the Kingdom's traditional enemy Iran.

The same is true of the Emirates. While the federation is part of an influential geopolitical axis with Saudi Arabia and the US, its record on human rights, noted by US State Department reports, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International and Wikipedia, is appalling. (Iran's record may be no better and is perhaps a good deal worse, but it has been common knowledge for years.)

Advertisement

President Netanyahu of Israel is also in trouble, and about to be indicted for corruption by his own attorney-general. Many observers believe he is ready and willing to strike Iran as soon as the White House flashes a green light.

Whether war with Iran would indeed benefit these nations is a matter of opinion but a more important factor is the degree to which the fate of their rulers rests on a close relationship with the US, which in practice means a willingness to support the policies of President Trump.

Finally, while judges, the media and others must try to clarify the reasons for acts of violence, there is a huge difference between inferences drawn after a careful study of the facts and simply attributing motives according to one's political aims and personal prejudices. This is, after all, why we support the UN and other judicial tribunals.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Max Atkinson is a former senior lecturer of the Law School, University of Tasmania, with Interests in legal and moral philosophy, especially issues to do with rights, values, justice and punishment. He is an occasional contributor to the Tasmanian Times.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Max Atkinson

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Max Atkinson
Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy