Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Religious have no right to judgment on sexual orientation or gender identity

By Robin Banks, Anja Hilkemeijer and Rodney Croome - posted Thursday, 6 December 2018

These protections have a positive impact, not only on LGBTI people, but on policies, practices and productivity across the faith-based service sector.

The law improves faith-based agencies by encouraging them to employ staff on the basis of skill and provide services on the basis of need, instead of focusing on attributes that are irrelevant like sexuality and gender identity.

This is why many faith-based agencies have happily entrenched Tasmania's high legal standards in their day-to-day practice.


For example, in May this year Baptcare in Tasmania won an LGBTI community award for its comprehensive policies and training aimed at ensuring LGBTI staff and clients are included and safe.

We believe a key reason that Tasmania's ban on LGBTI discrimination in religious organisations is uncontroversial is that organisations like Baptcare have recognised the law is good for them.

Given all this, we naturally ask ourselves why there is so much fuss in Canberra about this issue when there is no fuss at all in Hobart.

Surely, if Tasmania's schools and hospitals benefit from higher discrimination standards so will their counterparts interstate?

We are also left wondering why so few commentators seem to be aware of, or interested in citing, theTasmanian precedent.

It's as if Tasmanian only makes the news when we fall short on human rights, not when we lead.


But our biggest concern is that federal legislation designed to give equal protection to LGBTI people in faith-based organisations may actually water-down Tasmania's gold-standard legislation.

There have been worrying public statements from members of both major parties about entrenching a positive right for schools to discriminate against teachers on the grounds of religious "ethos".

Not only could this allow discrimination, for example through the enforcement of gendered dress-codes, it could also mean Tasmanian schools that currently can't discriminate suddenly find themselves able to.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

99 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Robin Banks is the former Tasmanian Anti-Discrimination Commissioner, a human rights lawyers and a PhD candidate in discrimination law at the University of Tasmania.

Anja Hilkemeijer is a lecturer in law at the University of Tasmania Law School, specialising in human rights and religious freedom.

Rodney Croome is a spokesperson for Equality Tasmania and national advocacy group, just.equal. He who was made a Member of the Order of Australia in 2003 for his LGBTI advocacy.

Other articles by these Authors

All articles by Robin Banks
All articles by Anja Hilkemeijer
All articles by Rodney Croome

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 99 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy