Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Coalition’s hands-off housing policy points to 2019 election defeat

By Blake Pepper and Glen Anderson - posted Friday, 19 October 2018


For Australians under the age of 35, home ownership – particularly in metropolitan and outer metropolitan suburbs – has become almost impossible. The great Australian dream has steadily morphed into the great Australian nightmare. Couch surfing, rental serfdom, living with parents and in-laws for decades, gargantuan debt, and mortgage stress are now the norm.

A recent survey of more than 1000 Australians by Mortgage Choice and Core Data has revealed:

53.9% of Australians believe that traditional home ownership (a free-standing home in the suburbs) is no longer relevant;

Advertisement
  • 70% believe that traditional home ownership is out of line with reality; 
  • 87.3% believe that traditional home ownership is increasingly difficult due to the rapid escalation in property prices; and
  • 62.3% believe that only those with “with money” (surplus capital) can realise the dream of traditional home ownership.

A key driver of housing unaffordability is supply and demand. According to the 2015 Senate References Committee Report, Out of Reach? The Australian Housing Affordability Challenge, the annual supply of new dwellings in Australia has not increased since the 1980s.

The 2018 Grattan Institute Report, Housing Affordability: Re-imagining the Australian Dream, supports this claim, arguing that the number of dwellings per Australian resident has declined in the last decade, when similar developed economies (Austria, Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Switzerland, UK, USA) have experienced trends in the opposite direction.

Other drivers of housing unaffordability include record low interest rates, irresponsible commission driven lending, rapid population growth, speculative overseas buyers, negative gearing and capital gains concessions.

As median house prices have soared – in some cases doubling in just eight years – successive Coalition governments have refused to meaningfully intervene, fearing that if home equity were to decline even marginally, a backlash among older homeowning voters would follow.

Tellingly, the President of the NSW Young Liberals, Harry Stutchbury has argued against the Coalition’s hands-off policy:  

Advertisement

[The Coalition] is terrified of taking serious steps to tackle housing affordability… We should not foster a society where the largest determinant of your future living standards is whether or not your parents bought a home in metropolitan Sydney 30 years ago. But with a convoluted array of capital, taxation and planning distortions that is exactly what we are doing.Fixing this situation will require political bravery, but if done right, the Coalition government could tap into millions of aspirational, politically unaligned young Australians desperate for a feasible path to home ownership, just as Sir Robert Menzies did decades ago.

Former Coalition leader, John Hewson, has similarly broken ranks with current policy, characterising stratospheric home prices as akin to “intergenerational theft”. Rather than continuing with the status quo, he has called for a reduction in benefits investors can receive via negative gearing and capital gains concessions:

It will work in the direction of slowing the investor demand for housing, which has been a major reason I think demand has outstripped supply and, in those circumstances, it is something that should be done.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

14 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Blake Pepper is a graduate in Law and Commerce from the University of Newcastle.

Glen Anderson is a lecturer in law at the University of Newcastle. Dr Anderson researches and teaches in the areas of international law, equity, company and property law. He has formerly taught Australian and international politics.

Other articles by these Authors

All articles by Blake Pepper
All articles by Glen Anderson

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 14 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy