Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Redfern proves we must double our efforts to get policies right

By Fred Chaney - posted Monday, 23 February 2004

Does the trouble in Redfern spell the end of reconciliation, as some commentators have suggested this week? Does it show that our experiences and attitudes are so polarised that we can never bring together our experience as fellow Australians?

It is hardly surprising that Sunday night’s riots in Redfern attracted a lot of publicity, some of it helpful, much of it uninformed and inflammatory. This tragic situation, and our reaction to it, does show what we’re up against but to use the crisis to give up on reconciliation is irrational and dangerous.

We must respond to the Redfern riot by showing that we have learned something in the 30 years of the Redfern “experiment”. Firstly, we’ve learned how important it is for policy-makers to admit when we’ve got it wrong.


We must be prepared to honestly analyse successes and failures in past policy to chart a better way forward.

I have a photo of myself as a new, inexperienced Minister for Aboriginal Affairs in the early 1970s being conducted through Redfern as the project was getting off the ground.

We all look pretty pleased with ourselves, happy to bask in the potential of a plan for building self esteem, competence and a better future for Indigenous Australians. We believed that Redfern would reduce, or perhaps even fix, Aboriginal disadvantage and facilitate more successful integration into what too often had been a hostile white society.

The warning signs about Redfern were already apparent in the early 1980s. What had seemed a good idea at the time was not producing the kind of outcomes we’d anticipated.

All of us, white and black, who were involved over that period should feel a sense of personal responsibility for not asking some of the hard questions or being sufficiently critical of our own well-meaning efforts, and those of successive governments.

Parallels can be made with the flawed thinking that saw the removal of generations of Indigenous children from their families and communities. In retrospect, I don’t think we can be any more comfortable about our own period of policy-making than we were about earlier leaders who’d promoted assimilation. We just made different mistakes.


So, is Indigenous Affairs in better shape in 2004? Are policies of today any more likely to achieve results, for Indigenous Australians and the nation as a whole?

The enduring disadvantage which limits reconciliation was highlighted in last year’s report from the Productivity Commission, Overcoming Indigenous Disadvantage. Against the background of high birth rates and a dramatic increase in the proportion of young Indigenous people, it is widely acknowledged that if we don’t turn the situation around, the entire nation will suffer.

These days we benefit from the interventions of policy whistle blowers like Noel Pearson. His clarion call from the Cape for recognition of rights, but also for integration into the real economy, represents a frank assessment of what’s wrong and a direction for alternative policy.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

An edited version of this article was previously published in The Age on 19 February 2004.

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Fred Chaney is Co-Chair of Reconciliation Australia and Deputy President of the National Native Title Tribunal. He was Federal Minister for Aboriginal Affairs between 1978 and 1980.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Fred Chaney
Related Links
Department of Immigration, Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
Reconciliation Australia
Redfern/Waterloo Partnership Project
Photo of Fred Chaney
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy