Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Shortwave cuts could cost lives

By Ian Nance - posted Tuesday, 7 August 2018


I've spent the majority of a fascinating communications life in the broadcasting profession, firstly in radio then in television and film. But also it has been my technical hobby, building, testing, and operating all sorts of transmission systems for the sheer pleasure of scientific knowledge.

Hence I've been interested, and more than a little concerned, at the government's decision to let go of Radio Australia, this country's invaluable overseas broadcasting arm.

Here are my opinions on a facility which acts as our collective voice in a world of competing media interests.

Advertisement

There is no sound reason (pun intended) why Radio Australia should be a failure.

There were many arguments advanced for its closure, the main ones being that the technology was old, outdated, and now supplanted by various digital technologies.

To which I retort "rubbish!"

Radio Australia is a most readily accessible system for our overseas audiences, with only simple, battery powered, cheap, readily available short wave receivers needed by millions of listeners.

Radio Australia can always be there in some of the most remote parts of nations that are less developed economically or culturally than our own lucky country, or else be broadcasting to other societies of a totally different mien.

The informational benefit to overseas residents is the existence of a shortwave broadcast reception method which is technically simple to use and simply powered.

Advertisement

Content has never been a big problem with news and current events featuring strongly alongside Australian cultural aspects such as sport, music, and overall politics. But one of the most critical aspects of Radio Australia is its ability to serve as a counter-emergency alerting and information system for natural disasters or civil disturbance.

The arguments to abandon Radio Australia broadcasts seems to have stemmed largely from inexpert bureaucrats who had little appreciation of the art and philosophy of public broadcasting, its one-way streaming of messaging rather than interactivity, as well as its structural simplicity. Rather, their decisions appeared to be economic and overly reliant on the emergence of recent technologies and a subsequent fascination with them.

Their reasoning was that FM, satellite and internet systems would and could supplant the existing high frequency AM transmitters radiating Australia's voice around the world, but with particular importance to our immediate Pacific regions

Again, I say "utter rubbish!'

During a hypothetical local disaster with thousands of villagers distraught and shocked, which leader or controller is going to be able to manage command and control communication better – the one equipped with a shiny new loudhailer, flat batteries and no access to electric power, or the one using a purely acoustic megaphone and shouting loudly?

Why should the new be deemed superior to the old?

Thanks to the careful diligence of Graeme Dobell, a journalist for forty five years and reporting on Australian and international politics, foreign affairs and defence and the Asia Pacific since 1975,there are well-reasoned proposals afoot in his submission to create an entirely new broadcasting organisation designed specifically for world-wide reception, the Australian International Broadcasting Corporation.

This A.I.B.C. would be a novel chartered structure and would not supplant our existing Australian Broadcasting Corporation, which continues its existing as well as newly-emerging local and national Australian platforms.

Instead, the proposed AIBC would undertake a completely fresh broadcasting totality for our international neighbours, embracing news, creative programming, the delicate diplomatic role of presenting foreign policy detail and political reportage yet remaining editorially independent and functioning with unbiased neutrality, much as the greatly-lauded BBC World Service.

Its style of technology and engineering management could resemble that currently employed by the ABC, but more importantly it would be there as an emergency disaster management resource, much as the ABC already is within Australia.

One of our immediate neighbours, Vanuatu, is most concerned at the possible loss of advantages and benefits to its society. That nation's Prime Minister, Charlot Salwai, recently called on the Australian government to reinstate Radio Australia's shortwave service in the Pacific. The Australian Broadcasting Corporation ceased shortwave broadcasting in the Asia-Pacific region in January 2017 ahead of a transition to FM transmission.

In his submission to the current government inquiry into the ABC's decision to cut the service, Mr. Salwai, said that removing shortwave radio to Vanuatu could cost lives, and part of his proposition stated:

In times of crisis when other forms of media like FM and digital services are unavailable, remote communities rely on broadcasts safely transmitted from outside the disaster zone.

This is exactly the role Radio Australia shortwave broadcasts played during Cyclone Pam.

For us, shortwave is not out-dated technology – it is appropriate and 'fit for purpose', and an important means to inform and safeguard Ni-Vanutu people.

Thus it will be extremely interesting to see just what happens in both a policy and commonsense aspect following the outcomes of the government review into broadcast services in the Asia Pacific.

That review is being conducted jointly by the Department of Communications and the Arts and the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, and submissions have just closed

It is assessing the reach of Australia's media in the Asia-Pacific region, including examining whether shortwave radio technology should be used. All media distribution platforms-television, radio and online-are being examined including commercial, community and publicly funded services.

The review is also looking at different types of technologies such as analogue, digital and satellite radio and television services and online services.

We have accumulated a great deal of organisational and technical skills over our many years of operating Radio Australia. To me, this proposal for the creation of the AIBC re-inforces my innate opinion that it is ever-important for our kookaburra's voice to always call to the world – loudly and clearly.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Ian Nance's media career began in radio drama production and news. He took up TV direction of news/current affairs, thence freelance television and film producing, directing and writing. He operated a program and commercial production company, later moving into advertising and marketing.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Ian Nance

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Ian Nance
Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy