Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Legal control over personal genetic data: how far should we go?

By Natasha Stott Despoja - posted Tuesday, 31 October 2000


We ... know that one of the main reasons women refuse genetic testing for susceptibility to breast cancer is the fear that the insurance companies may either deny them coverage or raise their rates to unaffordable levels.

If such information was required by insurance companies I fear that Australian women will deny themselves testing and further examination. If one more woman feels comfortable about taking a genetic test for breast cancer then I think my Bill would be proven worthwhile.

I disagree with IFSAs argument that responsible industry self-regulation is more likely to serve the interests of consumers and policy holders, though I do acknowledge that this is a significant step forward in a domestic policy climate that is receiving no direction from Government.

Advertisement

With the absence of leadership from the Government on the issue (an issue which some Government offices still deny exists) IFSA must be commended for attempting to grapple with this complex issue.

I hope that my Bill has, in some way, added to the public and legislative debate regarding the need for legal protection against the misuse of genetic information and therefore is a step in the wider evolution of privacy rights in Australia.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All

This is an edited extract from a speech given at the third Menzies Scholars Symposium on Friday 13 October 2000.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Senator Natasha Stott Despoja was the Australian Democrats spokesperson on Foreign Affairs, Attorney-Generals, Science & Biotechnology, Higher Education and the Status of Women (including Work & Family). She is a former Senator for South Australia.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Natasha Stott Despoja
Related Links
Australian Democrat Party
Australian Parliament House
Photo of Natasha Stott Despoja
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy