Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Consistent bioethical standards are the only way to control cloning research

By Michael Cook - posted Thursday, 19 February 2004


Instead, he intends to use cloned embryos to produce embryonic stem cell lines which might ultimately yield cures for diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease and diabetes.

But no matter how much Hwang and other scientists in favour of therapeutic cloning try to distance themselves from reproductive cloning, their ethical scruples are unconvincing.

They all agree that it is currently a threat to the health of human babies, as most cloned animals are born with significant abnormalities. But if these health problems can be overcome, what then?

Advertisement

Most scientists are quick to call reproductive cloning “dangerous” but are very loath to denounce it as intrinsically immoral. Last year, for instance, more than 60 of the world's leading science academies, including Australia’s, called for an international ban on reproductive cloning. But they said it "should be reviewed periodically in the light of scientific and social developments".

In other words, they were hedging their bets. If reproductive cloning ever becomes safe, it might become necessary to make it ethical as well.

Cynical? Of course, but Hwang’s ethics and the fulsome support given to his work by America’s leading science group, invites cynicism.

This time they turned a blind eye to unethical exploitation of Korean women to advance their pet project of therapeutic cloning. When reproductive cloning is no longer dangerous there is little doubt that their ethics will be just as flexible.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

1 post so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Michael Cook edits the Internet magazine MercatorNet and the bioethics newsletter BioEdge.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Michael Cook
Related Links
BioEdge
Article Tools
Comment 1 comment
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy