Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Revenue sharing will ignite gas production

By Mark S. Lawson - posted Monday, 1 May 2017


A 2013 report by the US Energy Information Administration which looked at potential production from fracking in other countries pointed to a number of formations in Australia with just as much potential as those in the US and Canada. The most prospective to these, as judged by the EIA, included the Cooper basin well out in South West Queensland, partially in South Australia, which already has a lot of conventional oil and gas development.

Another huge area is the Canning basin which is North West Australia which has been assessed and drilled over many years without anyone starting production. It is very remote.

A more likely bet for development is the Perth basin north of Perth which has handy access to pipelines and the Maryborough basin on the coast North of Brisbane. However, the Perth basin pipes only connect to Perth and WA has enough gas for the moment. The big LNG plants that compress gas taken from CSG wells for shipment overseas are well to the North. As of last year, the Maryborough basin was rated as largely unexplored, but again there is no handy, existing infrastructure for moving the gas.

Advertisement

Even the conventional Browse offshore field is on the other side of the continent from most of the major population centres, and a long way even from the LNG trains of the North West shelf. The closest town of any size is Broome.

In early 2016, Woodside announced that it would shelve plans for a $40 billion floating LNG plant, due to cost pressures and poor commodity prices. An earlier plan for an onshore plant at James Price Point was scrapped due to cost problems and the ever present, activist opposition to development of any kind.

Despite continually protests and the cost issues of remote locations, the Queensland government is still releasing areas for exploration, albeit out in the west where activists are less likely to bother the explorers.

To ramp up production in Queensland, where most of the CSG action to date has occurred, and unlock gas development in NSW we need a game changer, which may mean letting farmers take a share of the revenue. Then watch production explode.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

This article was first published in the Australian Spectator.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

9 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mark Lawson is a senior journalist at the Australian Financial Review. He has written The Zen of Being Grumpy (Connor Court).

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mark S. Lawson

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Mark S. Lawson
Article Tools
Comment 9 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy