Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Sport is not the place for social engineering

By Lyle Shelton - posted Wednesday, 26 April 2017


We of course are not perfect and we’ve all seen ugly incidents but what warms the heart is our ability to call this out and deal with it without a government-mandated ‘process’.

We don’t need the HRC to tell us that bullying – for any reason – is wrong.

Any compassionate person, of which I believe most Australians are, will be sensitive to a young person working through issues of sexuality or gender identity.

Advertisement

But without recourse to a free and open conversation about how we might accommodate them, the HRC’s guidelines require sporting clubs to allow men and boys identifying as women to use the toilets, showers and change rooms of their chosen gender.

This is not a suggestion, it is a legal requirement under the Discrimination Act, according to the HRC.

The key question is, are the mums and dads of Canberra comfortable with their daughters sharing intimate facilities with males (no surgery is required according to the HRC guidelines) who have decided to identify as females or indeed no gender?

The ‘T’ in LGBTIQ is used to describe these people as Transgender and of course it applies to women identifying as men.

Those pushing for change argue there is no threat to women and girls from allowing men with penises, who identify as women, to share their intimate facilities.

For most this is probably true. But we are talking about a very new social phenomenon about which there has been little community debate before the HRC stepped in with its legislation-backed “guidelines”.

Advertisement

The Washington DC based conservative think tank, the Heritage Foundation, recently documented 130 incidents of men in North America using new-found access to women’s facilities for acts of voyeurism.

It is naïve to think that girls and women will not feel uncomfortable and vulnerable to abuse through such an ill-thought out law.

The HRC, like many of the political activists pushing for change, conflate the heart-breaking physical issue of babies born with ambiguous genitalia – a condition known as intersex – to push for transgender rights.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Lyle Shelton is Managing Director of the Australian Christian Lobby based in Canberra.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Lyle Shelton

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Lyle Shelton
Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy