Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Leap of faith on the National Electricity Market required

By Mark Christensen - posted Monday, 20 February 2017


However smart and committed, our NEM institutions do not have real skin in the multi-billion-dollar game. I doubt AEMO would have opted for load shedding had it been accountable to those who do have a commercial interest in success. I also doubt the over-bearing rules and regulations of the NEM would flourish like they do if the rule-maker (currently the AEMC) and rule-enforcer (currently the AER) were part of industry rather than government.

Alas, the prospect of an agile, efficient NEM is bad news for many established players, including the endless roster of lawyers and consultants sustained by the perpetual conflict that arises when a vast bureaucracy loses its way.

And so identification, escalation and resolution of real issues go on being thwarted.

Advertisement

The truly terrifying news for Turnbull and Energy Minister Frydenberg is that large-scale electricity supply is under siege from battery-backed solar PV. The national grid is at serious risk of collapse. At best, it will become a rump, a mere back-up for businesses and households using self-generated, localised power. This has major social and budgetary implications, all of which remain too hard for the policy elite.

Ironically, a refusal to engage reality – including the fact regulatory protections are unnecessary in a disruptive world where traditional utilities face intense competition from their own customers – prolongs the damaging myth salvation involves more government interference.

It's time the PM made a leap of faith. Time to give the NEM ideal a proper shake-up and change the status quo by privatising the industry, not just the assets.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

18 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mark is a social and political commentator, with a background in economics. He also has an abiding interest in philosophy and theology, and is trying to write a book on the nature of reality. He blogs here.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mark Christensen

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 18 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy