Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Trump not that bad

By Peter Coates - posted Wednesday, 18 January 2017


Not everyone is part of the anti-Trump herd. Trump's rise recognises the superiority of power over international law and the advantages of being proactive rather than reactive.

The Western intelligentsia are critical of the US for being too brash and strong. The US is held to unattainable standards of furthering human rights while being meek. Obama has epitomised a US hyper-sensitive, apologetic response, rather than a readiness to wield America's hard earned power. Meanwhile Putin's frequently aggressive actions are widely accepted in Russia and by many outside.

I would say the media is likely to pillory Trump's every statement and imagined failingfor about 2 weeks from his Inauguration on Friday, January 20, 2017, until February 4, 2017. Then the media, realising the sky hasn't fallen, will adopt a more balanced view of Trump's strengths and limitations.

Advertisement

The following are some beliefs and predictions.

Power over international law

International law completely relies on the most powerful countries creating it and supporting it. The peak international legal regulator, the United Nations system, was createdin the US in 1944-45 with the help of the 4 most powerful countries. These countries were the 4 major victor nations (Russia, UK, France and China) and the US itself. For the last 71 years by exercising their Power of Veto they can block international legal resolutions and consequently actions.

The powerful can also create international law to vastly increase their own military power. The five powerful countries made ownership of nuclear weapons a legal right held by themselves alone.

Obama, with his liberal minded lawyer background, never chose to recognise that power is the foundation of law rather than the other way round. Obama diverged from his usual apologetic approach in what may have been his most successful proactive national security initiative – that was having bin Laden executed in 2011, which rapidly boosted Obama's popularity.

Trump's traits were inevitably exaggerated during the long Primary-Electoral process. In that process major candidates made patriotic and ideological statements that seem extreme to we non-Americans.

Advertisement

Advantages of Being ProactiveRather Than Reactive

I think Trump is proactive, searching for opportunities, rather than reactive. Making the opposition react to a proactor's statements and timing is a key part of international power politics.

In contrast a President with a legalistic approach requires a crime (breaking international law) to be committed before he gets the US to react. Obama was repeatedly hesitant, fearing his liberal legacy would be tarnished. By the time Obama acted many situations, like IS's advance into Iraq, were out of hand. Obama also simply gave up on Crimea-eastern Ukraine.

Under Obama the US was constantly surprised about developments, including the Arab Spring, Syrian Civil War, IS invasion of much of Syria-Iraq and the Taliban's re-expansion into Afghanistan. In the Middle East the US incorrectly anticipated the victory of democratic forces. This failure was tied to Obama's tendency to champion democracy when democracy was (and is) very weak in the Middle East compared to Islamist tendencies (Sharia law, resulting dictatorship and Sunni vs Shia hatreds).

The Trump Contrast

Trump, without prompting, has proactively voiced a whole range of positions that caught political attention and helped him win the Election. On the international stage it is other nations that will need to react to Trump's next moves rather than the US hesitantly reacting to Islamists, Putin and China.

Trump's mooted reconciliation with Putin-Russia is partly aimed at gaining more power over Russia and China in the triangular international order. This will hopefully be reminiscent of Kissinger-Nixon's earlier success with China and Soviet Russia.

The Trump-Putin rapprochement will involve less US sanctions and less condemnation of Russia over Ukraine. In return US-Russian coordinated action against IS in Syria (and even against IS in Iraq) may quickly eliminate IS as a landholder – but not IS as a terrorist nurturer. With Iranian-Russian military relations being in some ways surprisingly close Russia may become an element to strengthen Iranian-US relations.

Russia is not only a European power but an Asia-Pacific power. A China that is viewing improved relations between Russia and the US may be more amenable to lowering its posture in the South China Sea. China may continue its island/reef building but may reduce its Nine-Dash Line stridency.

Trump has statedhe will put economic pressure on China due to China's monetary policies. Trump also wants to pull out of Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) talks. All this may make the US a protectionist pariah. Trump risks sharp reactions from Wall Street free marketeers and from major regional countries, like Japan and Australia.

Mexico, for its part, is unlikely to react to Trump's US-Mexican border wall pledge by actually subsidising the border wall. Instead Mexico might form a "new" Mexican force to dissuade would-be border crossers. Mexico's National Gendarmerie, which is already involved in border security, might be given more money, power and a new, tougher, name for the US audience.

A next prediction is Trump is unlikely to carry out his threat of significantly reducing US military deployments in Japan and South Korea as any withdrawals would encourage North Korea. Trump may make counter-threats against North Korea's latest Kim.

Finally, in the short-medium term, the US cannot afford the greatly expanded US Navy (from 272 to 350 ships) that Trump pledged. Hurdles include the countervailing pledge to significantly reduce taxes (hence reducing the US Government's revenue base). Spending much more money on rich US weapons making corporations may also put Trump offside with his working class support base.

Conclusion

Trump's appreciation that power is more respected than international law on the international stage stands him in good stead from January 20. Also promising is Trump's ability to time his statements, proactively creating the agenda, rather than reacting to proactive Islamists, Putin and China. International confidence that Trump recognises boundaries may be sorely tested. We'll see how many of the predictions above prove accurate.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

28 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Peter Coates has been writing articles on military, security and international relations issues since 2006. In 2014 he completed a Master’s Degree in International Relations, with a high distinction average. His website is Submarine Matters.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Peter Coates

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Peter Coates
Article Tools
Comment 28 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy