Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The end of coal is nigh – someone just needs to tell the Turnbull government

By Suzanne Harter - posted Tuesday, 20 December 2016


Malcolm Turnbull stated that coal will be an important part of Australia's future "for many, many decades to come."

But that statement has been undermined by the bipartisan Senate Environment and Communications Committee, which released an interim report on the Retirement of coal fired power stations in Australia.

The report is timely because coal is currently Australia's biggest source of climate pollution, and with Australia having recently ratified the Paris Climate Agreement, it's very clear that our commitment to cut carbon pollution is inconsistent with using coal to generate energy.

Advertisement

One clear measure is the fact that per capita Australia has one of the highest levels of carbon pollution in the developed world. That means that every Australian is responsible for producing more pollution than people in other similar economies.

Not surprisingly, the senate committee report calls on the government to create a comprehensive national energy transition plan including a mechanism for the orderly retirement of coal fired power generation, and the establishment of an energy transition authority to manage the transition, particularly for workers and communities in regions such as the Latrobe Valley.

Despite ongoing opposition from a group of rogue coalition senators headed by Liberal David Bushby, the fact is that the committee's key recommendations were largely endorsed by Australia's biggest power companies, academics, unions and affected communities like those in the Latrobe Valley.

These are the groups with the most skin in the game when it comes to an energy transformation in Australia – and they are all calling for a national transition plan. They realise that closure of dirty coal-burning power stations is happening and it needs to be managed so that the process is orderly and takes care of impacted communities.

Systematic retirement of coal generators will encourage more investment in clean energy sources and planned closure will also allow time to better prepare communities for the transition and ensure adequate policies for mine and generator rehabilitation.

There are 24 operating coal-burning generators in Australia. The report states that the question is not if coal-fired power stations will close but how quickly and orderly these closures will occur and what supporting policies, if any, will be in place to help manage the process.

Advertisement

Further, if Australia is to meet our international commitments to the Paris climate agreement including emissions reductions consistent with the 2C goal, our existing coal stations essentially need to have closed by the early 2030s. The Climate Institute has calculated that this is roughly equivalent to the rate of the equivalent of a Hazelwood a year.

That's a tall order – but the need to do so is getting more urgent by the day.

Just this month it has been revealed that an investigation led by eminent marine scientists into the impact of the Great Barrier Reef's recent coral bleaching event show that in the worst affected area 67 per cent of a 700km area in the north of the reef has lost its shallow-water corals over the past eight to nine months.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

25 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Suzanne Harter is a climate campaigner for ACF.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Suzanne Harter

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 25 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy