Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Universities’ wrong-headed investment decisions harm students

By John Slater - posted Tuesday, 6 December 2016

For years student activists on campuses across Australia have been campaigning for universities to divest from so-called unethical fossil fuel investments.

And they have been quite successful. In September, Queensland University of Technology joined the Australian National University, La Trobe University and the University of Sydney in committing to withdrawing all investments connected to the fossil fuel industries.

The idea behind the "fossil-free" movement is that univer­sities have long been at the forefront of progress and social justice, and should not be com­plicit in supporting or profiting from an ­industry that they claim is pushing Earth towards climate catastrophe.


But while much is said about the moral duty of universities to invest responsibly for the benefit of Mother Earth, seldom mentioned is their legal obligation to manage funds in the best interests of their students.

The regulations governing QUT's $300 million external funds purse state that "investments shall be made at the most advantageous rate available" in order to support the university's strategic goals in education, ­research and community.

In other words, the fund exists to better the education of QUT's present and future students.

There are well-founded doubts about whether that end can be achieved to maximum effect while the fund shuns any investment in an ­industry worth $138 billion a year, or 8.5 per cent of our ­national economy.

On this score, QUT's last flirtation with divestment is a cautionary tale worth heeding. In 2008 the student-run QUT Guild's endowment lost almost 50 per cent of its net worth overnight when it attempted divestment from resource investments.

That spurning investment in one of our greatest sources of ­national wealth hurt the guild in the hip pocket should come as no surprise.


Mining accounts for half of Australia's export earnings. Coal - described by some as the preferred energy source of Lucifer himself - netted us a tidy $40bn in exports last year alone. On the investing side, resource companies regularly feature among the ASX's best performing stocks and count for two of our 10 wealthiest companies.

With forecasts predicting that minerals and energy export earnings will increase by 6 per cent each year to 2020, it stretches credulity that a $300m investment fund could be left no worse off after washing its hands of one of the economy's most dynamic generators of wealth.

Given that at least some of QUT's investment funds are held in trust, the decision to divest ­raises serious questions concerning the university's duty to manage the fund with undivided loyalty to its beneficiaries - namely its students.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

This article was first published in The Australian.

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

5 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

John Slater is a student and an intern at the Cato Institute.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by John Slater

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 5 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy