Last Friday, The Australian columnist Jamie Walker delivered a shrill pitch against assisted dying titled "insurers baulk at 'suicide cover' as SA debates euthanasia." In it he claimed that legalisation of assisted dying would "force a showdown with the $28 billion life insurance industry."
Such was Mr Walker's hyperbole that it seemed the legalisation of assisted dying might single-handedly lead to the collapse of a massive section of the national economy.
The fall guy for the argument was the current South Australian (SA) Voluntary Euthanasia Bill. Section 28 of the Bill prohibits insurers from excluding a life policy payout for an insured person who dies under the Bill's voluntary euthanasia provisions.
Advertisement
Mr Walker's article argued that such an exclusion would be in conflict with Commonwealth law. (Section 228 of the Life Insurance Act 1995 (Commonwealth), which is not named in the article, expressly permits exclusion of suicide cover from life insurance policies). In the article, Financial Services Council (FSC) CEO Sally Loane refers to Section 109 of the Constitution of Australia which rules that Commonwealth law prevails over State law when there is any conflict between the two.
If these points were all the relevant facts,then the SA Bill's insurance exclusion clause would simply fail to be of any force or effect and the world would keep turning as before.
But they aren't all the facts.
Section 28 of the SA Bill states that insurance policies may not exclude a payout in relation to 'voluntary euthanasia.' However, the Commonwealth Life Insurance Act is completely silent on the matter of voluntary euthanasia: it permits policy exclusion only in respect of 'suicide.'
Further, Section 23 of the SA Bill expressly states that a death under its provisions is not a suicide, and may not be determined as such even by the Coroner.
Consequently, there is no actual 'suicide' conflict in law. Indeed, a similar 'not a suicide' provision has stood in Oregon's Death With Dignity Act (DWDA) since 1997 with no crisis - or even ripple - in the USA insurance industry.
Advertisement
So much for the spectacular "showdown."
The 'suicide' argument not only fails in law, but in practice as well. Most life insurance policies in Australia do in fact cover suicide, except for the first year of insurance. To avoid the creation of an insurance policy with the intention of a payout claim by suicide, most Australian policies exclude suicide for the first thirteen months. That extends across the first year of insurance plus a 30-day grace period to pay the renewal premium.
Thus, most Australian life insurance policies cover suicide once a renewal premium has been paid.
Discuss in our Forums
See what other readers are saying about this article!
Click here to read & post comments.
1 post so far.