Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Milked-dry: government meddling is the problem for milk industry, not the solution

By Johnny Kahlbetzer - posted Thursday, 26 May 2016

The plight of Victorian dairy farmers has as much to do with the agricultural policies of successive federal governments, as with the current price of milk. While Agricultural Minister Barnaby Joyce has now announced concessional loans, it has been evident since at least 2012, when the Murray Darling Basin Plan was legislated, that these farmers faced a bleak future. Back then politicians from both the Labor and Coalition could have addressed real issues being drawn to their attention, instead they claimed these issues were too hard politically, and potentially a vote loser in South Australia.

Before May 2009, my company, Twynam Agricultural Group, was the largest private holder of irrigation rights in the Murray Darling Basin. Then Twynam sold 240,000 megalitres of water entitlement to the federal government, comprising the largest single sale of water for the environment in Australia's history. While Twynam benefited financially from water reform, by 2011 I could see that the process was not actually delivering any environmental benefit, while potentially undermining the financial viability of irrigated agriculture across the Murray Darling Basin.

It is not so many federal elections ago, that the Australian public were being encouraged, if we cared about the environment, to vote for more environmental flows for the Murray River's mouth and Lower Lakes in South Australia. Back in 2004, Mark Latham was promising the buy-back of 1,500,000 megalitres of water for the environment, and John Howard only 500,000. But by January 2007, under the Howard government's $10 billion National Plan for Water Security, it was agreed that 2,700,000 megalitres – almost double what Labor had proposed only a few years earlier – be returned as environmental flow.


I know of people who live on the shores of Lake Alexandrina, which is at the termination of the Murray Darling Basin, explain that the only place that they can get their water is upstream. They have campaigned against rice and cotton growing in the Murray Darling, and for more environmental flows. These same people now insist we buy more dairy, and Australian branded milk.

Activism against irrigated agriculture, and the political response, has significantly forced-up the price of water for all food producers in the Basin, including dairy farmers. Furthermore it is dairy farmers who are most vulnerable and the Victorian dairy industry is too big to save by people buying locally.

Victoria accounts for approximately 85 percent of Australia's dairy exports, worth around $2.3 billion in 2013-14. The export focus means that returns for most dairy farmers are linked to world dairy commodity prices and exchange rates. So, if the Federal Government really wants to help Victorian dairy farmers, it should cut red tape, and not unnecessarily add to production costs. Instead the price of temporary water, on a market increasingly controlled by governments, has increased from $30 per megalitres to almost $300 per megalitres as a direct result of the water buybacks. Reduced reliability of water supply and a corresponding extraordinary increase in the price of this key input may be the straw that finally breaks the Victorian dairy industry's back; much a consequence of government intervention, not only drought.

Victorian dairy farms are mostly family-owned, high turnover, low profit small businesses. Since the Snowy Hydro-electricity and irrigation scheme, unlike rice and cotton growers in New South Wales, dairy farmers in Victoria had access to 'High Security' water. What this meant was that, before all the 'water reforms', back when a water allocation was 'attached' to land, Victorian dairy farmers generally held a guaranteed allocation to see them through, even during periods of drought. Over the last few years, more than 20 percent of this water has been purchased by the Commonwealth Environmental Water Holder (CEWH), with the Lower Lakes and Murray Mouth now a priority destination for this water. Indeed during the last drought the banks, industry farm consultants, and especially governments, were encouraging dairy farmers to sell their valuable high security water entitlements, and make the change to buying water on the temporary water market.

The Victorian State Government removed a cap on non-primary producers trading water in 2009, and so state owned entities and the South Australian Government now buy, sell and speculate in this market to ensure maximum return for their shareholders. For example, the Melbourne Water Authority in most years trades the 75,000 megalitres of water allocated to it by the Victorian State government for the North-South Pipeline, which was closed years ago.

This temporary water was traded at $25 per megalitre in 2012, $70 per megalitre in 2013, $130 in 2014, and $220 per megalitre last year. Late last year a prospectus from The Nature Conservancy Australia was encouraging city-based wealthy Australians to invest directly in Murray-Darling Basin water entitlements and water allocations (the Project). This organization was only recently established by US-based Nature Conservancy which has US$ 5.8 billion in global net assets.


It has been explained that such environmental organizations plan to buy water for internationally recognized wetlands, with the option of selling to farmers.

During the last drought, there was not enough water to keep the terminal lakes in South Australia full of freshwater. These are recognized as internationally important wetlands under the United Nation's Ramsar treaty, but have actually been in ecological decline for more than 70 years. What these wetlands need is not more freshwater, but rather tidal inflows from the Southern Ocean. But who is going to invest in a portfolio of seawater!

Historically, the vast shallow terminal lakes were estuarine. So, even before the Snowy Hydro scheme, Lake Alexandrina never dried-up because the Southern Ocean would push in during periods of extended drought. During the Federation drought of 1895-1902, which predates the development of irrigation in the Murray Darling, the salt water extended over 100 kilometers upstream to Mannum.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

9 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Johnny Kahlbetzer's company Twynam Agricultural Group grows cotton, wheat, beef cattle and sheep in the Murray Darling Basin depending on the availability of water. Concerned about the current direction of water reform, Mr Kahlbetzer is a founding member of to help raise awareness of the need to restore the Murray River's estuary.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Johnny Kahlbetzer

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Johnny Kahlbetzer
Article Tools
Comment 9 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy