Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

For the sake of the party, go with Tash

By Graham Young - posted Thursday, 15 March 2001


So the Democrats are thrown back into a contest for the protest vote they lost to One Nation last time. Stott Despoja is the only way to get it back for two reasons.

First, the GST decision in particular is holding the Democrats back and it is impossible for Lees to disclaim it. But Stott Despoja has never been party to it. She is a genuine fresh start in this respect. She also advances policies that sit well with One Nation protest voters.

One of the reasons that Hanson does well is that she is virtually a walking focus group. What ever people say to her she feeds back to all of us. Her agenda in terms of economics, employment, social welfare, immigration and race would be held by 60 to 70 per cent of the population. Little wonder because it is the agenda that any mainstream politician would have espoused up until the `60s - what Paul Kelly refers to in The End of Certainty as the "Deakinite Settlement" - and is still intuitive to many. With the exception of race issues, there is a lot of similarity to what Stott Despoja believes. It is an agenda opposed to "Economic Rationalism" and the various reforms of the `80s and `90s, and one which Lees is incapable of carrying because of her dealings with government.

Advertisement

Second, the Democrats will also be struggling for newspaper inches, radio megahertz and television and internet pixels. In the world of third party politics, earned media is particularly important. Major parties can spend millions on Radio and Television advertising, pamphletts and direct mail, third parties can't. Stott Despoja fascinates the media in a way that Lees doesn't. She has that celebrity quality that Hanson also has. And as Hanson proves, celebrity translates into protest votes.

While it might not be fair, and it might be sexist, in the modern world of celebrity politics, when you are playing your cards, a blonde is more likely to trump a red-head than a brunette is. For the Democrats this election is all about tearing voters back from Pauline Hanson. Their survival depends on it. They need their best card at the top of the pack. For Lees that means "Go Fish".

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Graham Young is chief editor and the publisher of On Line Opinion. He is executive director of the Australian Institute for Progress, an Australian think tank based in Brisbane, and the publisher of On Line Opinion.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Graham Young
Related Links
Australian Democrats Party
Photo of Graham Young
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy