The national interest demands a double dissolution

In Turnbull we have the most capable Prime Minister since Hawke, and he seems to have some talented people with him. After many years of disastrously bad government, and with many big problems looming, we should have an election and let them get on with it. No doubt they will make mistakes but there are no other serious options.

In the national interest Turnbull should visit the GG on or about 5 February to request a double dissolution election on 12 March.

That timing would allow one sitting week of Parliament where the troops could be rallied and instructed. The problems and solutions that will form the core of the campaign could be spelled out in solid parliamentary speeches. If the Government had the nerve it could pass an electoral bill with the help of The Greens to finally stop Senators being elected with votes of less than one per-cent.

If the Government was actually courageous it could use the Ian MacFarlane fiasco as an excuse to tell the Nationals to run in the Senate on their own, and that they would be opposed by Liberals in the Reps seats they hold. That would pretty much be the end of the rural handout party. With less bravery Turnbull could ensure, by setting the order on Senate candidate lists, that only one National gets up in the Senate races in NSW, Queensland and Victoria, reducing their representation from five. Of course this scenario is unlikely. The Nationals get less than 5% of the vote outside Queensland but the Liberals will probably keep propping them up.

The PM could also use the excuse of a sudden election to get central control of pre-selections and replace some of the least attractive MPs with talented newcomers.

The last step could be to preference the Greens in seats they can take from Labor. One of Bismark's great rules for success was to never fight a war on two fronts, which is where the ALP will find itself anyway, but the preferences would increase the problem.

The Coalition will probably win around 100 seats in the Reps, up from 90 now. That will leave the ALP in pathetic shape, sharing 50 seats with Greens and Independents. The survival of the ALP will depend on its response to the disaster. The Greens will be pushing hard to win more Reps seats and to portray themselves as a rational progressive party. Some of their branch members have already resigned due to the early signs of common sense from the new leadership so this election will set the scene for a real battle between the radical members who just want to protest everything and their saner MPs and voters.

A big win for Turnbull would mean the Liberals could govern without the Nationals if they so chose, even if the Nationals held their 15 seats in the House. The likely National survivors in the Senate are young and may be ambitious enough to join the Liberal Party if the rewards were high enough. The Nationals' leaders could hardly complain.

While an early election would solve various problems within his own side, Turnbull would also be empowered to refresh and implement key policies. He has said he would not make big changes to superannuation without taking them to an election so going early is the only way to get them into his first budget.

With so much sorted out the Government could frame a serious budget for May 10 as planned, and begin to tackle the many difficult problems that have been ignored for so long.

Those problems include the worsening failure of the private health system, which the Health Minister is keen to fix but could tackle more determinedly after an election.

Then there is the revenue/outlays problem. A massive win will help with the States and allow for serious cuts in spending. Most importantly it will empower Turnbull to do the really hard work of cutting handouts to his own well-off voters.

Just as Hawke and Keating had to enact a right wing agenda of reforming unions, privatising government assets, encouraging competition and making serious cuts to government spending, so Turnbull will have to take on the National Party's dud-farmer support schemes, business welfare, and all the absurd handouts Howard initiated in the boom years, which Labor failed to remove in its wasted six years in office.

And there is the entire energy-transition/climate-change policy challenge. We will not see real progress until after an election.

Our global environment includes the collapsing of the Islamic world, with Sudan, Libya, Syria and Iraq showing the way. Egypt, Turkey and others have their own specific problems. Nobody talks about the Arab spring any more. Millions of people are on the move and millions more want to follow.

Then there is Russia quietly going broke while getting ever more belligerent.

And Afghanistan, Pakistan, the Israel/Palestinian problem, and so many more issues that no one has any idea how to fix.

Are we helping to encircle China or are we upsetting the US?

It would be useful to have an established government rethinking Australia's role in this complex world.

There is also the issue of globalisation, which has been great up to now but could be about to get rough.

The financial crisis has been suspended for a few years by central banks injecting massive amounts of new money into the system but it looks like the magic may be about to stop working, as it eventually must. A big financial crunch could occur at any time. It would be best for all of us to have the election before rather then after such an event.

Put all this, and much more, together and there is a lot of work for a government to do.

Turnbull is going to have to be tough as he faces the real world issues. He should harden up his smiley face image with some tough action against his internal foes and the Senate. A few more third-rate enemies will be neither here nor there.

This will be one of the most important elections in the nations history, even though we already know who will win. Lets do it on March 12.